HBR vs. IBLC
HBR (Canary HBAR ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. HBR is actively managed, while IBLC is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HBR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.
Performance
HBR vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBR achieves a -21.13% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 31.00% return.
HBR
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- -21.13%
- 6M
- -39.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- 31.00%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 64.83%
- 3Y*
- 50.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBR vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBR Canary HBAR ETF | -21.13% | -46.02% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 31.00% | -32.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBR and IBLC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBR vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank
HBR
IBLC
HBR vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary HBAR ETF (HBR) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBR | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.03 | 0.39 | -1.43 |
Drawdowns
HBR vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBR drawdown since its inception was -61.62%, roughly equal to the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBR and IBLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBR | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.62% | -62.54% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.93% | -13.87% | -44.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.15% | -25.88% | -19.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.58% | — |
Volatility
HBR vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBR | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.88% | 54.80% | +19.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.88% | 64.46% | +9.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.88% | 64.46% | +9.42% |
HBR vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBR vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison
HBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBR Canary HBAR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 4.82% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBR and IBLC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HBR.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 0.00% for HBR.
They also come from different issuers: Canary Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HBR and 0.47% for IBLC.
Find the right allocation for HBR and IBLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer