PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBR vs. LTCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBR vs. LTCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canary HBAR ETF (HBR) and Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBR achieves a -26.35% return, which is significantly higher than LTCC's -42.05% return.


HBR

1D
-1.26%
1M
-10.66%
YTD
-26.35%
6M
-30.19%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LTCC

1D
2.46%
1M
-16.18%
YTD
-42.05%
6M
-42.19%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBR vs. LTCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HBR
Canary HBAR ETF
-26.35%-49.43%
LTCC
Canary Litecoin ETF
-42.05%-25.94%

Correlation

The correlation between HBR and LTCC is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.84

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBR vs. LTCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary HBAR ETF (HBR) and Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HBR vs. LTCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HBR vs. LTCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBR drawdown since its inception was -63.61%, roughly equal to the maximum LTCC drawdown of -61.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBR and LTCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBRLTCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.61%

-61.39%

-2.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.75%

-58.65%

-4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.71%

-39.30%

-9.41%

Volatility

HBR vs. LTCC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBRLTCCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.66%

63.64%

+9.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.66%

63.64%

+9.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.66%

63.64%

+9.02%

HBR vs. LTCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than LTCC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBR vs. LTCC - Dividend Comparison

Neither HBR nor LTCC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HBR and LTCC have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HBR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HBR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for LTCC.

HBR and LTCC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HBR and 0.95% for LTCC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBR and LTCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer