HBR vs. LTCC
HBR (Canary HBAR ETF) and LTCC (Canary Litecoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Canary Capital. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HBR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for LTCC.
Performance
HBR vs. LTCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBR achieves a -26.35% return, which is significantly higher than LTCC's -42.05% return.
HBR
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -10.66%
- YTD
- -26.35%
- 6M
- -30.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LTCC
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- -16.18%
- YTD
- -42.05%
- 6M
- -42.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBR vs. LTCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBR Canary HBAR ETF | -26.35% | -49.43% |
LTCC Canary Litecoin ETF | -42.05% | -25.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBR and LTCC is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBR vs. LTCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary HBAR ETF (HBR) and Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBR vs. LTCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBR drawdown since its inception was -63.61%, roughly equal to the maximum LTCC drawdown of -61.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBR and LTCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBR | LTCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.61% | -61.39% | -2.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.75% | -58.65% | -4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.71% | -39.30% | -9.41% |
Volatility
HBR vs. LTCC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBR | LTCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.66% | 63.64% | +9.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.66% | 63.64% | +9.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.66% | 63.64% | +9.02% |
HBR vs. LTCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than LTCC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBR vs. LTCC - Dividend Comparison
Neither HBR nor LTCC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HBR and LTCC have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HBR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HBR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for LTCC.
HBR and LTCC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HBR and 0.95% for LTCC.
Find the right allocation for HBR and LTCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer