PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBR vs. BCDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBR vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canary HBAR ETF (HBR) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBR achieves a -20.38% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 3.23% return.


HBR

1D
-2.47%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
-20.38%
6M
-41.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCDF

1D
-0.16%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
3.23%
6M
4.02%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBR vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HBR
Canary HBAR ETF
-20.38%-46.02%
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
3.23%-2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between HBR and BCDF is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBR vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBR

BCDF
BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBR vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary HBAR ETF (HBR) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HBR vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBRBCDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.03

0.39

-1.42

Drawdowns

HBR vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBR drawdown since its inception was -61.62%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBR and BCDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBRBCDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.62%

-27.70%

-33.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.53%

-7.63%

-49.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.06%

-9.83%

-35.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

Volatility

HBR vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBRBCDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.13%

14.76%

+59.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.13%

16.94%

+57.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.13%

16.94%

+57.19%

HBR vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBR vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

HBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
2.45%2.53%1.63%0.69%0.38%
HBR
Canary HBAR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HBR and BCDF have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HBR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HBR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BCDF.

BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.00% for HBR.

They also come from different issuers: Canary Capital and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HBR and 0.85% for BCDF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBR and BCDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer