HBIL.TO vs. CSHI

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

HBIL.TO (Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)) and CSHI (NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBIL.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while CSHI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HBIL.TO returned 2.56% vs 8.68% for CSHI. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HBIL.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for CSHI.

Performance

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HBIL.TO is traded in CAD, while CSHI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSHI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBIL.TO achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than CSHI's 6.24% return.

HBIL.TO

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 0.93%
• 6M: 0.87%
• 1Y: 2.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHI

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 6.24%
• 6M: 6.40%
• 1Y: 8.68%
• 3Y*: 8.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HBIL.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)	0.93%	3.04%	-1.22%
CSHI NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	6.24%	0.26%	7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between HBIL.TO and CSHI is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2024	0.03

The correlation between HBIL.TO and CSHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBIL.TO

HBIL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 57
HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
HBIL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
HBIL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 59
HBIL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
HBIL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 56

CSHI

CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HBIL.TO	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.95	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.79	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.36	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	2.41	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.59	6.82	+1.77

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the CSHI Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBIL.TO and CSHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBIL.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.66%, smaller than the maximum CSHI drawdown of -6.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIL.TO and CSHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBIL.TO	CSHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-6.04%	+4.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.95%	-3.61%	+2.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.47%	-1.60%	+1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	1.28%	-0.98%

Volatility

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) is 0.35%, while NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that HBIL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBIL.TO	CSHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.35%	1.19%	-0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.25%	3.36%	-2.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62%	4.48%	-2.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.01%	6.12%	-4.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.01%	6.12%	-4.11%

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBIL.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison

HBIL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%, more than CSHI's 5.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSHI NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	5.31%	5.11%	5.72%	6.15%	1.52%
HBIL.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)	6.49%	7.48%	2.58%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBIL.TO and CSHI in my portfolio?

HBIL.TO and CSHI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HBIL.TO or CSHI?

On fees, HBIL.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HBIL.TO or CSHI?

HBIL.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for CSHI.

What is the main difference between HBIL.TO and CSHI?

HBIL.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while CSHI is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HBIL.TO and 0.38% for CSHI.