HBIL.TO vs. CSHI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HBIL.TO (Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)) and CSHI (Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBIL.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while CSHI is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the NONE. HBIL.TO is actively managed, while CSHI is passively managed. Over the past year, HBIL.TO returned 2.87% vs 6.61% for CSHI. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. HBIL.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for CSHI.

Performance

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HBIL.TO is traded in CAD, while CSHI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSHI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBIL.TO achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than CSHI's 3.56% return.

HBIL.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 0.59%
• 6M: 0.53%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHI

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 3.56%
• 6M: 2.19%
• 1Y: 6.61%
• 3Y*: 6.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HBIL.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)	0.59%	3.05%	-1.40%
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	3.56%	0.23%	7.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HBIL.TO and CSHI is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024	-0.13

Return for Risk

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBIL.TO

HBIL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 56
HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
HBIL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
HBIL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 56
HBIL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
HBIL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 56

CSHI

CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HBIL.TO	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.40	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	1.92	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.25	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	1.84	+1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.74	5.39	+4.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the CSHI Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBIL.TO and CSHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HBIL.TO	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	1.40	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	1.23	-0.59

Drawdowns

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBIL.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum CSHI drawdown of -4.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIL.TO and CSHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBIL.TO	CSHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-4.85%	+3.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.95%	-3.60%	+2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	0.00%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.48%	-1.34%	+0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	1.23%	-0.93%

Volatility

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) is 0.62%, while Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) has a volatility of 0.79%. This indicates that HBIL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBIL.TO	CSHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.62%	0.79%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.24%	3.55%	-2.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66%	4.75%	-3.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.03%	5.89%	-3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.03%	5.89%	-3.86%

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBIL.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

HBIL.TO vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison

HBIL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than CSHI's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	4.90%	5.11%	5.72%	6.15%	1.52%
HBIL.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)	6.52%	7.49%	2.58%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBIL.TO and CSHI in my portfolio?

HBIL.TO and CSHI have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HBIL.TO or CSHI?

On fees, HBIL.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HBIL.TO or CSHI?

HBIL.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for CSHI.

What is the main difference between HBIL.TO and CSHI?

HBIL.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while CSHI is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HBIL.TO and 0.38% for CSHI.