HBF.TO vs. CNQE.TO
HBF.TO (Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged)) and CNQE.TO (Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. HBF.TO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CNQE.TO.
Performance
HBF.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBF.TO achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly lower than CNQE.TO's 39.35% return.
HBF.TO
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 25.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
CNQE.TO
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 39.35%
- 6M
- 37.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBF.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBF.TO Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) | 8.15% | 9.10% |
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 39.35% | 13.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBF.TO and CNQE.TO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBF.TO vs. CNQE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HBF.TO
CNQE.TO
HBF.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBF.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.46 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.52 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBF.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 2.48 | -1.99 |
Drawdowns
HBF.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBF.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.28%, which is greater than CNQE.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBF.TO and CNQE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBF.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.28% | -18.22% | -17.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -6.08% | +4.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -4.12% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | — | — |
Volatility
HBF.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBF.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 33.12% | -22.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.07% | 33.12% | -19.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 33.12% | -16.17% |
HBF.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBF.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CNQE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBF.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Dividend Comparison
HBF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, less than CNQE.TO's 9.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 9.40% | 4.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HBF.TO Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) | 7.41% | 7.27% | 7.48% | 7.52% | 7.75% | 5.62% | 6.34% | 6.57% | 7.72% | 6.86% | 7.54% | 7.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBF.TO and CNQE.TO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNQE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNQE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HBF.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest Portfolios Group and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HBF.TO and 0.40% for CNQE.TO.
Find the right allocation for HBF.TO and CNQE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer