HBF.TO vs. METE.TO
HBF.TO (Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged)) and METE.TO (Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds from Harvest Portfolios Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HBF.TO returned 25.20% vs -5.95% for METE.TO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HBF.TO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for METE.TO.
Performance
HBF.TO vs. METE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBF.TO achieves a 8.15% return, which is significantly higher than METE.TO's -4.55% return.
HBF.TO
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 25.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
METE.TO
- 1D
- 5.47%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- -4.55%
- 6M
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- -5.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBF.TO vs. METE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBF.TO Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) | 8.15% | 14.88% |
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | -4.55% | -0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBF.TO and METE.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBF.TO vs. METE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HBF.TO
METE.TO
HBF.TO vs. METE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO) and Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBF.TO | METE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.46 | -0.16 | +2.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.52 | 0.02 | +3.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.00 | +0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | -0.17 | +3.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.35 | -0.36 | +13.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBF.TO | METE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | -0.16 | +2.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | -0.09 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
HBF.TO vs. METE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBF.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.28%, smaller than the maximum METE.TO drawdown of -40.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBF.TO and METE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBF.TO | METE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.28% | -40.10% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.79% | -35.48% | +27.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -22.07% | +20.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -15.68% | +8.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 16.51% | -14.62% |
Volatility
HBF.TO vs. METE.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO) is 2.65%, while Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that HBF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBF.TO | METE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 9.99% | -7.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.79% | 28.26% | -20.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 36.57% | -26.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.07% | 42.08% | -28.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 42.08% | -25.13% |
HBF.TO vs. METE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBF.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than METE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBF.TO vs. METE.TO - Dividend Comparison
HBF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, less than METE.TO's 25.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBF.TO Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) | 7.41% | 7.27% | 7.48% | 7.52% | 7.75% | 5.62% | 6.34% | 6.57% | 7.72% | 6.86% | 7.54% | 7.74% |
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 25.77% | 21.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBF.TO and METE.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, METE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HBF.TO.
Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HBF.TO and 0.40% for METE.TO.
Find the right allocation for HBF.TO and METE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer