SMCO vs. COMT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SMCO (Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMCO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Hilton, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMCO returned 22.05% vs 47.51% for COMT. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMCO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.

Performance

SMCO vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF (SMCO) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCO achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.

SMCO

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 12.31%
• 6M: 11.53%
• 1Y: 22.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMT

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: 39.67%
• 6M: 39.06%
• 1Y: 47.51%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: 9.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCO vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SMCO Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF	12.31%	6.46%	17.78%	7.84%
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	39.67%	6.07%	5.96%	-4.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCO and COMT is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023	0.00

The correlation between SMCO and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SMCO vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCO

SMCO Risk / Return Rank: 43
SMCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SMCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SMCO Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SMCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
SMCO Martin Ratio Rank: 48

COMT

COMT Risk / Return Rank: 71
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCO vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF (SMCO) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMCO	COMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	2.24	-0.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.88	-0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.40	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	5.95	-3.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.82	14.11	-6.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMCO vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCO Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCO and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMCO	COMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	2.24	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	0.20	+0.80

Drawdowns

SMCO vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCO drawdown since its inception was -22.71%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCO and COMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMCO	COMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.71%	-51.89%	+29.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.56%	-8.02%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-4.82%	+4.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-24.07%	+20.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	3.38%	-0.55%

Volatility

SMCO vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF (SMCO) is 3.92%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that SMCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMCO	COMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.92%	7.37%	-3.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.81%	18.80%	-6.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.76%	21.29%	-5.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.22%	21.06%	-2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.22%	18.89%	-0.67%

SMCO vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMCO vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

SMCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	5.54%	7.74%	4.90%	5.19%	29.79%	17.79%	0.36%	2.61%	11.65%	5.16%	0.52%	1.44%
SMCO Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF	0.90%	1.01%	0.47%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMCO and COMT in my portfolio?

SMCO and COMT have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMCO or COMT?

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to SMCO (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCO dropped -22.71% vs COMT's -51.89%.

Which ETF is better, SMCO or COMT?

On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 47.51% vs 22.05% for SMCO. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, SMCO has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMCO or COMT?

Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 47.51% return vs 22.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMCO or COMT?

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SMCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMCO or COMT?

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.90% for SMCO.

What is the main difference between SMCO and COMT?

SMCO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Hilton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SMCO and 0.48% for COMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.