HAZ.TO vs. BDIV.TO
HAZ.TO (Global X Active Global Dividend ETF) and BDIV.TO (Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF) are both Global Equity Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HAZ.TO returned 13.75%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for BDIV.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HAZ.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAZ.TO achieves a 14.39% return, which is significantly higher than BDIV.TO's 9.72% return.
HAZ.TO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 11.72%
- YTD
- 14.39%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- 13.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.16%
BDIV.TO
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 19.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- —
HAZ.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAZ.TO Global X Active Global Dividend ETF | 14.39% | 7.49% | 25.38% | 17.61% | -8.86% | 27.34% | 7.50% | 15.27% | -0.73% |
BDIV.TO Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF | 9.72% | 18.14% | 25.34% | 11.23% | -16.24% | 22.15% | -0.56% | 22.02% | -6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAZ.TO and BDIV.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2018 | 0.40 |
The correlation between HAZ.TO and BDIV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAZ.TO vs. BDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HAZ.TO
BDIV.TO
HAZ.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Global Dividend ETF (HAZ.TO) and Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAZ.TO | BDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.30 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 2.14 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.19 | 9.24 | +4.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAZ.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAZ.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.55%, smaller than the maximum BDIV.TO drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAZ.TO and BDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAZ.TO | BDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.55% | -36.44% | +10.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.48% | -9.11% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.09% | -13.65% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.07% | -24.34% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -3.43% | +2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.22% | -6.57% | +3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 2.11% | -0.54% |
Volatility
HAZ.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Active Global Dividend ETF (HAZ.TO) is 2.44%, while Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV.TO) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that HAZ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAZ.TO | BDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.44% | 4.08% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.82% | 10.06% | -2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.27% | 11.94% | -1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 14.73% | -2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.28% | 18.70% | -4.42% |
Dividends
HAZ.TO vs. BDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
HAZ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than BDIV.TO's 5.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDIV.TO Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF | 5.80% | 6.05% | 6.43% | 7.21% | 7.11% | 5.30% | 6.12% | 5.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAZ.TO Global X Active Global Dividend ETF | 1.25% | 1.48% | 0.96% | 1.78% | 3.40% | 1.71% | 1.93% | 2.27% | 2.31% | 2.20% | 2.40% | 2.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAZ.TO and BDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Brompton.
Find the right allocation for HAZ.TO and BDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer