BDIV.TO vs. DXG.TO
BDIV.TO (Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF) and DXG.TO (Dynamic Active Global Dividend ETF) are both Global Equity Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BDIV.TO returned 10.85%/yr vs 15.64%/yr for DXG.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BDIV.TO vs. DXG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDIV.TO achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly lower than DXG.TO's 19.78% return.
BDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 8.69%
- YTD
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- 20.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- —
DXG.TO
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- YTD
- 19.78%
- 1Y
- 25.99%
- 3Y*
- 31.35%
- 5Y*
- 15.64%
- 10Y*
- —
BDIV.TO vs. DXG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDIV.TO Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF | 10.93% | 18.14% | 25.34% | 11.23% | -16.24% | 22.15% | -0.56% | 22.02% | -6.67% |
DXG.TO Dynamic Active Global Dividend ETF | 19.78% | 13.33% | 55.25% | 10.41% | -16.50% | 10.24% | 35.26% | 24.34% | -0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDIV.TO and DXG.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2018 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDIV.TO vs. DXG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BDIV.TO
DXG.TO
BDIV.TO vs. DXG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV.TO) and Dynamic Active Global Dividend ETF (DXG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDIV.TO | DXG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.21 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 2.21 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 7.78 | +1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDIV.TO vs. DXG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, which is greater than DXG.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDIV.TO and DXG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDIV.TO | DXG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.44% | -26.03% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -11.81% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.65% | -22.90% | +9.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.34% | -26.03% | +1.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -6.49% | +4.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -6.18% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 3.35% | -1.25% |
Volatility
BDIV.TO vs. DXG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV.TO) is 3.94%, while Dynamic Active Global Dividend ETF (DXG.TO) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that BDIV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDIV.TO | DXG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 7.65% | -3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 18.75% | -8.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.89% | 21.71% | -9.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.72% | 19.52% | -4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 19.50% | -0.80% |
Dividends
BDIV.TO vs. DXG.TO - Dividend Comparison
BDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, while DXG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDIV.TO Brompton Global Dividend Growth ETF | 5.74% | 6.05% | 6.43% | 7.21% | 7.11% | 5.30% | 6.12% | 5.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DXG.TO Dynamic Active Global Dividend ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.23% | 0.50% | 0.17% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDIV.TO and DXG.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Brompton and Dynamic.
Find the right allocation for BDIV.TO and DXG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer