PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAYW vs. EBF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HAYW vs. EBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) and Ennis, Inc. (EBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAYW achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly lower than EBF's 25.62% return.


HAYW

1D
-1.56%
1M
-10.84%
6M
-6.26%
YTD
-2.07%
1Y
-0.26%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
-8.88%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-2.14%

EBF

1D
0.65%
1M
2.65%
6M
14.47%
YTD
25.62%
1Y
30.63%
3Y*
9.34%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
8.70%
ALL TIME*
6.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.25M$2.62M$3.13M
$47.93M$48.36M$42.75M

HAYW vs. EBF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HAYW
Hayward Holdings, Inc.
-2.07%1.05%12.43%44.68%-64.16%54.29%
EBF
Ennis, Inc.
25.62%-9.96%12.59%3.64%19.38%-4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between HAYW and EBF is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2021

0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HAYW:

$3.28B

EBF:

$551.50M

EPS

HAYW:

$0.73

EBF:

$1.65

PE Ratio

HAYW:

20.81

EBF:

13.18

PEG Ratio

HAYW:

1.09

EBF:

0.94

PS Ratio

HAYW:

2.88

EBF:

1.43

PB Ratio

HAYW:

2.09

EBF:

1.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

HAYW:

$1.17B

EBF:

$393.82M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HAYW:

$521.11M

EBF:

$121.26M

EBITDA (TTM)

HAYW:

$305.78M

EBF:

$71.61M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAYW vs. EBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HAYW
HAYW Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
HAYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAYW Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
HAYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAYW Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

EBF
EBF Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBF Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HAYW vs. EBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) and Ennis, Inc. (EBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HAYWEBFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.24

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

2.61

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.14

6.01

-6.16

HAYW vs. EBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAYW Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the EBF Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAYW and EBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAYW vs. EBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAYW drawdown since its inception was -70.49%, roughly equal to the maximum EBF drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAYW and EBF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAYWEBFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.49%

-73.10%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.04%

-11.14%

-12.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.81%

-22.80%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.49%

-22.80%

-47.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.08%

-0.50%

-44.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.14%

-20.51%

-22.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.35%

4.83%

+6.52%

Volatility

HAYW vs. EBF - Volatility Comparison

Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) has a higher volatility of 11.16% compared to Ennis, Inc. (EBF) at 4.91%. This indicates that HAYW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAYWEBFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.16%

4.91%

+6.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.21%

17.21%

+8.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.17%

22.28%

+10.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.10%

21.50%

+19.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.94%

26.07%

+15.87%

Dividends

HAYW vs. EBF - Dividend Comparison

HAYW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EBF
Ennis, Inc.
4.59%5.55%16.60%4.56%4.51%4.86%5.04%4.16%4.94%3.61%11.67%3.64%
HAYW
Hayward Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HAYW vs. EBF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hayward Holdings, Inc. and Ennis, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

HAYW vs. EBF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hayward Holdings, Inc. and Ennis, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

HAYW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hayward Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 155.05M and revenue of 318.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.7%.

EBF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ennis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 31.08M and revenue of 98.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.5%.

HAYW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hayward Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 76.00M and revenue of 318.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.

EBF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ennis, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.59M and revenue of 98.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.8%.

HAYW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hayward Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.62M and revenue of 318.38M, resulting in a net margin of 14.3%.

EBF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ennis, Inc. reported a net income of 9.88M and revenue of 98.62M, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HAYW and EBF have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAYW has higher volatility (11.16%) compared to EBF (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAYW dropped -70.49% vs EBF's -73.10%.

EBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAYW and EBF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer