PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAYW vs. BAH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HAYW vs. BAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAYW achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly higher than BAH's -16.10% return.


HAYW

1D
-1.56%
1M
-10.84%
6M
-6.26%
YTD
-2.07%
1Y
-0.26%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
-8.88%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-2.14%

BAH

1D
2.06%
1M
11.64%
6M
-19.95%
YTD
-16.10%
1Y
-34.73%
3Y*
-15.70%
5Y*
-2.21%
10Y*
10.63%
ALL TIME*
15.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$197.35M$164.53M$161.00M
$47.93M$48.36M$42.75M

HAYW vs. BAH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HAYW
Hayward Holdings, Inc.
-2.07%1.05%12.43%44.68%-64.16%54.29%
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
-16.10%-33.02%2.00%24.47%25.71%9.02%

Correlation

The correlation between HAYW and BAH is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2021

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HAYW:

$3.28B

BAH:

$8.39B

EPS

HAYW:

$0.73

BAH:

$8.47

PE Ratio

HAYW:

20.81

BAH:

8.23

PEG Ratio

HAYW:

1.09

BAH:

0.24

PS Ratio

HAYW:

2.88

BAH:

0.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

HAYW:

$1.17B

BAH:

$11.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HAYW:

$521.11M

BAH:

$4.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

HAYW:

$305.78M

BAH:

$1.24B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAYW vs. BAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HAYW
HAYW Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
HAYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAYW Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
HAYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAYW Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

BAH
BAH Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
BAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAH Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAH Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HAYW vs. BAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HAYWBAHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.87

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

-0.74

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.14

-1.33

+1.19

HAYW vs. BAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAYW Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is higher than the BAH Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAYW and BAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAYW vs. BAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAYW drawdown since its inception was -70.49%, which is greater than BAH's maximum drawdown of -66.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAYW and BAH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAYWBAHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.49%

-66.59%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.04%

-45.19%

+21.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.81%

-66.59%

+34.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.49%

-66.59%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.08%

-60.98%

+15.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.14%

-11.20%

-31.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.35%

25.06%

-13.71%

Volatility

HAYW vs. BAH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) is 11.16%, while Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) has a volatility of 13.40%. This indicates that HAYW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAYWBAHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.16%

13.40%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.21%

31.52%

-6.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.17%

40.61%

-7.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.10%

31.93%

+9.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.94%

29.16%

+12.78%

Dividends

HAYW vs. BAH - Dividend Comparison

HAYW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
3.27%2.61%1.59%1.47%1.65%1.75%1.42%1.35%1.69%1.78%1.66%1.69%
HAYW
Hayward Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HAYW vs. BAH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hayward Holdings, Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

HAYW vs. BAH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hayward Holdings, Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

HAYW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hayward Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 155.05M and revenue of 318.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.7%.

BAH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.46B and revenue of 2.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.

HAYW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hayward Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 76.00M and revenue of 318.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.

BAH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 279.00M and revenue of 2.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

HAYW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hayward Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.62M and revenue of 318.38M, resulting in a net margin of 14.3%.

BAH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a net income of 198.00M and revenue of 2.80B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HAYW and BAH have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAH has higher volatility (13.40%) compared to HAYW (11.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAYW dropped -70.49% vs BAH's -66.59%.

HAYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAYW and BAH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer