PortfoliosLab logo
EBF vs. MMM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EBF and MMM is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EBF vs. MMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ennis, Inc. (EBF) and 3M Company (MMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EBF:

0.44

MMM:

1.40

Sortino Ratio

EBF:

0.69

MMM:

2.58

Omega Ratio

EBF:

1.09

MMM:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

EBF:

0.43

MMM:

1.20

Martin Ratio

EBF:

1.26

MMM:

8.86

Ulcer Index

EBF:

7.06%

MMM:

5.68%

Daily Std Dev

EBF:

23.71%

MMM:

35.95%

Max Drawdown

EBF:

-73.10%

MMM:

-59.10%

Current Drawdown

EBF:

-11.31%

MMM:

-6.96%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EBF:

$506.47M

MMM:

$82.96B

EPS

EBF:

$1.54

MMM:

$8.02

PE Ratio

EBF:

12.62

MMM:

19.22

PEG Ratio

EBF:

3.36

MMM:

3.56

PS Ratio

EBF:

1.28

MMM:

3.38

PB Ratio

EBF:

1.68

MMM:

18.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

EBF:

$394.62M

MMM:

$24.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EBF:

$117.29M

MMM:

$10.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

EBF:

$51.97M

MMM:

$6.60B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBF achieves a -5.93% return, which is significantly lower than MMM's 20.00% return. Over the past 10 years, EBF has outperformed MMM with an annualized return of 8.02%, while MMM has yielded a comparatively lower 4.76% annualized return.


EBF

YTD

-5.93%

1M

3.20%

6M

-4.89%

1Y

10.46%

3Y*

12.84%

5Y*

9.85%

10Y*

8.02%

MMM

YTD

20.00%

1M

18.39%

6M

20.84%

1Y

49.85%

3Y*

13.04%

5Y*

8.82%

10Y*

4.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Ennis, Inc.

3M Company

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EBF vs. MMM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EBF is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EBF is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EBF is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EBF is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EBF is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EBF is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

MMM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MMM is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MMM is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MMM is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MMM is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MMM is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MMM is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EBF vs. MMM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ennis, Inc. (EBF) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the MMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBF and MMM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

EBF vs. MMM - Dividend Comparison

EBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.10%, more than MMM's 1.84% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EBF
Ennis, Inc.
18.10%16.60%4.56%4.51%4.86%5.04%4.16%4.94%3.61%12.68%3.64%5.20%
MMM
3M Company
1.84%2.60%5.49%4.97%3.33%3.36%3.26%2.86%2.00%2.49%2.72%2.08%

Drawdowns

EBF vs. MMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBF drawdown since its inception was -73.10%, which is greater than MMM's maximum drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBF and MMM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EBF vs. MMM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ennis, Inc. (EBF) is 7.54%, while 3M Company (MMM) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that EBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

EBF vs. MMM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ennis, Inc. and 3M Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20212022202320242025
92.70M
5.95B
(EBF) Total Revenue
(MMM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EBF vs. MMM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ennis, Inc. and 3M Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
29.5%
41.6%
(EBF) Gross Margin
(MMM) Gross Margin
EBF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ennis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 27.36M and revenue of 92.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.5%.

MMM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, 3M Company reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 5.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.6%.

EBF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ennis, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.01M and revenue of 92.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.

MMM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, 3M Company reported an operating income of 1.25B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

EBF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ennis, Inc. reported a net income of 9.02M and revenue of 92.70M, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.

MMM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, 3M Company reported a net income of 1.12B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.