EBF vs. MMM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EBF (Ennis, Inc.) and MMM (3M Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — EBF in Business Equipment & Supplies, MMM in Conglomerates. Over the past 10 years, EBF returned 8.54%/yr vs 4.71%/yr for MMM. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EBF vs. MMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ennis, Inc. (EBF) and 3M Company (MMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBF achieves a 21.97% return, which is significantly higher than MMM's 2.07% return. Over the past 10 years, EBF has outperformed MMM with an annualized return of 8.54%, while MMM has yielded a comparatively lower 4.71% annualized return.

EBF

• 1D: 4.69%
• 1M: 5.62%
• YTD: 21.97%
• 6M: 21.50%
• 1Y: 18.81%
• 3Y*: 11.65%
• 5Y*: 7.22%
• 10Y*: 8.54%

MMM

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 6.17%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 11.70%
• 3Y*: 28.24%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: 4.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBF vs. MMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EBF Ennis, Inc.	21.97%	-9.96%	12.59%	3.64%	19.38%	14.78%	-13.46%	17.54%	-2.77%	24.65%
MMM 3M Company	2.07%	26.36%	46.13%	-3.33%	-29.63%	4.85%	2.77%	-4.29%	-16.90%	34.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EBF and MMM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 1987	0.27

The correlation between EBF and MMM shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS EBF : $2.44 MMM : $5.17
PE Ratio EBF : 8.76 MMM : 31.33
PS Ratio EBF : 1.26 MMM : 3.49
Total Revenue (TTM) EBF : $296.04M MMM : $25.02B
Gross Profit (TTM) EBF : $92.28M MMM : $9.89B
EBITDA (TTM) EBF : $75.72M MMM : $5.28B

Return for Risk

EBF vs. MMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBF

EBF Risk / Return Rank: 67
EBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
EBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
EBF Omega Ratio Rank: 61
EBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
EBF Martin Ratio Rank: 71

MMM

MMM Risk / Return Rank: 55
MMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
MMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
MMM Omega Ratio Rank: 50
MMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
MMM Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBF vs. MMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ennis, Inc. (EBF) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EBF	MMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	0.46	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	0.83	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.10	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	0.63	+1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.73	1.37	+2.36

EBF vs. MMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the MMM Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBF and MMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EBF vs. MMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBF drawdown since its inception was -73.10%, which is greater than MMM's maximum drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBF and MMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBF	MMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.10%	-59.10%	-14.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.41%	-18.77%	+7.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.80%	-22.87%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.80%	-53.34%	+30.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.32%	-59.10%	+23.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.11%	-6.42%	+3.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.56%	-16.10%	-4.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.05%	8.55%	-3.50%

Volatility

EBF vs. MMM - Volatility Comparison

Ennis, Inc. (EBF) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to 3M Company (MMM) at 4.83%. This indicates that EBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBF	MMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.29%	4.83%	+2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.93%	19.29%	-2.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.64%	25.88%	-3.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.47%	28.31%	-6.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.22%	26.54%	-0.32%

Dividends

EBF vs. MMM - Dividend Comparison

EBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than MMM's 1.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBF Ennis, Inc.	4.67%	5.55%	16.60%	4.56%	4.51%	4.86%	5.04%	4.16%	4.94%	3.61%	11.67%	3.64%
MMM 3M Company	1.87%	1.82%	16.27%	5.49%	4.97%	3.33%	3.36%	3.26%	2.86%	2.00%	2.49%	2.72%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBF and MMM in my portfolio?

EBF and MMM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EBF or MMM?

EBF has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to MMM (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBF dropped -73.10% vs MMM's -59.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.