EBF vs. MMM

In the year-to-date period, EBF achieves a -6.86% return, which is significantly lower than MMM's -1.20% return. Over the past 10 years, EBF has outperformed MMM with an annualized return of 10.09%, while MMM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.49% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ennis, Inc. (EBF) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the MMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBF and MMM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.04%, more than MMM's 2.23% yield.

The maximum EBF drawdown since its inception was -73.10%, which is greater than MMM's maximum drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBF and MMM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Ennis, Inc. (EBF) is NaN%, while 3M Company (MMM) has a volatility of NaN%. This indicates that EBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ennis, Inc. and 3M Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.