EBF vs. HCC
EBF (Ennis, Inc.) and HCC (Warrior Met Coal, Inc.) are both stocks. EBF operates in Business Equipment & Supplies (Industrials), while HCC operates in Coking Coal (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, EBF returned 7.22%/yr vs 39.13%/yr for HCC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EBF vs. HCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBF achieves a 21.97% return, which is significantly higher than HCC's -2.16% return.
EBF
- 1D
- 4.69%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 21.97%
- 6M
- 21.50%
- 1Y
- 18.81%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
HCC
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -3.29%
- 1Y
- 95.76%
- 3Y*
- 33.98%
- 5Y*
- 39.13%
- 10Y*
- —
EBF vs. HCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBF Ennis, Inc. | 21.97% | -9.96% | 12.59% | 3.64% | 19.38% | 14.78% | -13.46% | 17.54% | -2.77% | 35.76% |
HCC Warrior Met Coal, Inc. | -2.16% | 63.49% | -9.79% | 81.59% | 41.03% | 21.82% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 23.20% | 131.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBF and HCC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2017 | 0.27 |
The correlation between EBF and HCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EBF:
$2.44
HCC:
$2.61
EBF:
8.76
HCC:
32.99
EBF:
0.51
HCC:
0.77
EBF:
1.26
HCC:
3.09
EBF:
$296.04M
HCC:
$1.47B
EBF:
$92.28M
HCC:
$887.07M
EBF:
$75.72M
HCC:
$296.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBF vs. HCC — Risk / Return Rank
EBF
HCC
EBF vs. HCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ennis, Inc. (EBF) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EBF | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.31 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 3.94 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.73 | 9.56 | -5.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EBF vs. HCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBF drawdown since its inception was -73.10%, which is greater than HCC's maximum drawdown of -64.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBF and HCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBF | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.10% | -64.81% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.41% | -24.41% | +13.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.80% | -45.53% | +22.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.80% | -45.53% | +22.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.11% | -21.92% | +18.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.56% | -18.09% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 10.06% | -5.01% |
Volatility
EBF vs. HCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ennis, Inc. (EBF) is 7.29%, while Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) has a volatility of 24.64%. This indicates that EBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBF | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.29% | 24.64% | -17.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.93% | 36.83% | -19.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.64% | 56.94% | -34.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 49.69% | -28.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.22% | 52.51% | -26.29% |
Dividends
EBF vs. HCC - Dividend Comparison
EBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than HCC's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBF Ennis, Inc. | 4.67% | 5.55% | 16.60% | 4.56% | 4.51% | 4.86% | 5.04% | 4.16% | 4.94% | 3.61% | 11.67% | 3.64% |
HCC Warrior Met Coal, Inc. | 0.37% | 0.36% | 1.51% | 1.90% | 4.45% | 0.78% | 0.94% | 21.85% | 27.91% | 45.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
EBF vs. HCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ennis, Inc. and Warrior Met Coal, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
EBF and HCC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HCC has higher volatility (24.64%) compared to EBF (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBF dropped -73.10% vs HCC's -64.81%.
HCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EBF and HCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer