PortfoliosLab logo
EBF vs. HCC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EBF and HCC is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EBF vs. HCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ennis, Inc. (EBF) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EBF:

0.44

HCC:

-0.53

Sortino Ratio

EBF:

0.79

HCC:

-0.49

Omega Ratio

EBF:

1.10

HCC:

0.94

Calmar Ratio

EBF:

0.51

HCC:

-0.53

Martin Ratio

EBF:

1.52

HCC:

-1.00

Ulcer Index

EBF:

7.02%

HCC:

24.09%

Daily Std Dev

EBF:

23.75%

HCC:

48.46%

Max Drawdown

EBF:

-73.10%

HCC:

-64.81%

Current Drawdown

EBF:

-10.85%

HCC:

-35.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EBF:

$508.04M

HCC:

$2.56B

EPS

EBF:

$1.54

HCC:

$2.00

PE Ratio

EBF:

12.66

HCC:

24.32

PEG Ratio

EBF:

3.36

HCC:

0.00

PS Ratio

EBF:

1.29

HCC:

1.94

PB Ratio

EBF:

1.68

HCC:

1.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

EBF:

$394.62M

HCC:

$1.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EBF:

$117.29M

HCC:

$442.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

EBF:

$51.97M

HCC:

$219.44M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBF achieves a -5.44% return, which is significantly higher than HCC's -11.39% return.


EBF

YTD

-5.44%

1M

3.74%

6M

-5.31%

1Y

10.28%

3Y*

13.04%

5Y*

10.58%

10Y*

8.08%

HCC

YTD

-11.39%

1M

-2.77%

6M

-28.25%

1Y

-25.49%

3Y*

15.93%

5Y*

30.37%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Ennis, Inc.

Warrior Met Coal, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EBF vs. HCC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EBF is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EBF is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EBF is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EBF is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EBF is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EBF is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

HCC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HCC is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HCC is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HCC is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HCC is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HCC is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HCC is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EBF vs. HCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ennis, Inc. (EBF) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the HCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBF and HCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

EBF vs. HCC - Dividend Comparison

EBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.00%, more than HCC's 0.67% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EBF
Ennis, Inc.
18.00%16.60%4.56%4.51%4.86%5.04%4.16%4.94%3.61%12.68%3.64%5.20%
HCC
Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
0.67%1.51%1.90%4.45%0.78%0.94%21.84%27.91%45.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EBF vs. HCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBF drawdown since its inception was -73.10%, which is greater than HCC's maximum drawdown of -64.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBF and HCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EBF vs. HCC - Volatility Comparison

Ennis, Inc. (EBF) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) have volatilities of 11.50% and 11.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

EBF vs. HCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ennis, Inc. and Warrior Met Coal, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20212022202320242025
92.70M
299.94M
(EBF) Total Revenue
(HCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EBF vs. HCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ennis, Inc. and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
29.5%
97.4%
(EBF) Gross Margin
(HCC) Gross Margin
EBF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ennis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 27.36M and revenue of 92.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.5%.

HCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a gross profit of 292.07M and revenue of 299.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.4%.

EBF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ennis, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.01M and revenue of 92.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.

HCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported an operating income of -17.38M and revenue of 299.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.8%.

EBF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ennis, Inc. reported a net income of 9.02M and revenue of 92.70M, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.

HCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a net income of -8.17M and revenue of 299.94M, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.