EBF vs. HCC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ennis, Inc. (EBF) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC).

Performance

EBF vs. HCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ennis, Inc. (EBF) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EBF vs. HCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EBF Ennis, Inc.	20.60%	-9.96%	12.59%	3.64%	19.38%	14.78%	-13.46%	17.54%	-2.77%	37.97%
HCC Warrior Met Coal, Inc.	5.75%	63.49%	-9.79%	81.59%	41.03%	21.82%	2.30%	1.98%	23.20%	125.04%

Fundamentals

EPS EBF : $2.45 HCC : $1.08
PE Ratio EBF : 8.73 HCC : 86.03
PEG Ratio EBF : 0.51 HCC : 2.01
PS Ratio EBF : 4.03 HCC : 3.75
Total Revenue (TTM) EBF : $92.70M HCC : $1.31B
Gross Profit (TTM) EBF : $27.36M HCC : $728.88M
EBITDA (TTM) EBF : $75.48M HCC : $143.41M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBF achieves a 20.60% return, which is significantly higher than HCC's 5.75% return.

EBF

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 20.60%
• 6M: 20.54%
• 1Y: 12.62%
• 3Y*: 9.61%
• 5Y*: 7.39%
• 10Y*: 7.25%

HCC

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 11.91%
• YTD: 5.75%
• 6M: 46.65%
• 1Y: 96.17%
• 3Y*: 37.58%
• 5Y*: 43.74%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EBF vs. HCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBF

EBF Risk / Return Rank: 57
EBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
EBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
EBF Omega Ratio Rank: 52
EBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EBF Martin Ratio Rank: 58

HCC

HCC Risk / Return Rank: 88
HCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
HCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
HCC Omega Ratio Rank: 84
HCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
HCC Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBF vs. HCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ennis, Inc. (EBF) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EBF	HCC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	1.75	-1.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	2.61	-1.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.32	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.78	3.80	-3.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.60	10.78	-9.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EBF vs. HCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the HCC Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBF and HCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EBF	HCC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56	1.75	-1.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.89	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.66	-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between EBF and HCC is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EBF vs. HCC - Dividend Comparison

EBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than HCC's 0.34% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBF Ennis, Inc.	4.67%	5.55%	16.60%	4.56%	4.51%	4.86%	5.04%	4.16%	4.94%	3.61%	11.67%	3.64%
HCC Warrior Met Coal, Inc.	0.34%	0.36%	1.51%	1.90%	4.45%	0.78%	0.94%	21.85%	27.91%	45.17%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EBF vs. HCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBF drawdown since its inception was -73.10%, which is greater than HCC's maximum drawdown of -64.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBF and HCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBF	HCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.10%	-64.81%	-8.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.62%	-24.41%	+8.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.80%	-45.53%	+22.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	-8.98%	+7.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.65%	-18.23%	-2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.61%	8.59%	-0.98%

Volatility

EBF vs. HCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ennis, Inc. (EBF) is 5.69%, while Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) has a volatility of 16.02%. This indicates that EBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBF	HCC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.69%	16.02%	-10.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.79%	37.00%	-23.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.72%	55.23%	-32.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.02%	49.54%	-28.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.29%	52.35%	-26.06%

Financials

EBF vs. HCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ennis, Inc. and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EBF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ennis, Inc. reported a gross profit of -60.33M and revenue of -195.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.8%.

HCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a gross profit of 379.95M and revenue of 383.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.0%.

EBF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ennis, Inc. reported an operating income of -25.67M and revenue of -195.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

HCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported an operating income of 34.65M and revenue of 383.99M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

EBF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ennis, Inc. reported a net income of 10.83M and revenue of -195.87M, resulting in a net margin of -5.5%.

HCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a net income of 22.96M and revenue of 383.99M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.