PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAWX vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAWX vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HAWX having a 17.15% return and IFLO slightly lower at 16.93%.


HAWX

1D
0.85%
1M
1.78%
YTD
17.15%
6M
17.23%
1Y
36.02%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
12.59%

IFLO

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
16.93%
6M
16.46%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAWX vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HAWX and IFLO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.78

HAWX vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HAWX
IFLO

Financial Services

23.2%
1.1%

Technology

22.5%
21.5%

Industrials

14.2%
18.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
13.8%

Basic Materials

6.9%
11.3%

Healthcare

6.8%
11.7%

Communication Services

4.9%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
2.8%

Energy

4.8%
12.1%

Utilities

3.0%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.4%
0.0%

Financial Services

HAWX
23.2%
IFLO
1.1%

Technology

HAWX
22.5%
IFLO
21.5%

Industrials

HAWX
14.2%
IFLO
18.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HAWX
7.5%
IFLO
13.8%

Basic Materials

HAWX
6.9%
IFLO
11.3%

Healthcare

HAWX
6.8%
IFLO
11.7%

Communication Services

HAWX
4.9%
IFLO
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

HAWX
4.8%
IFLO
2.8%

Energy

HAWX
4.8%
IFLO
12.1%

Utilities

HAWX
3.0%
IFLO
1.0%

Real Estate

HAWX
1.4%
IFLO
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAWX vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAWX
HAWX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

IFLO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAWX vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HAWXIFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.83

HAWX vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAWX vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAWX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAWX and IFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAWXIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.63%

-6.44%

-24.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-6.44%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-3.37%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.27%

-1.25%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

Volatility

HAWX vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAWXIFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

14.75%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

14.75%

-1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.27%

14.75%

+0.52%

HAWX vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAWX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAWX vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

HAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.39%2.80%3.31%2.95%16.94%2.63%2.00%3.23%2.51%2.40%2.49%3.86%
IFLO
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF
1.51%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAWX and IFLO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, HAWX leads with 36.02% vs 32.28% for IFLO. On fees, HAWX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HAWX has performed better with a 36.02% return vs 32.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HAWX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

HAWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HAWX and 0.56% for IFLO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAWX and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer