HAWX vs. IFLO
HAWX (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, HAWX returned 29.34% vs 33.15% for IFLO. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HAWX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.
Performance
HAWX vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAWX achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 18.73% return.
HAWX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
IFLO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 15.77%
- YTD
- 18.73%
- 1Y
- 33.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAWX vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HAWX iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 14.28% | 16.11% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 18.73% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAWX and IFLO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.76 |
The correlation between HAWX and IFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
HAWX vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HAWX
IFLO
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
HAWX
IFLO
Technology
HAWX
IFLO
Industrials
HAWX
IFLO
Consumer Cyclical
HAWX
IFLO
Basic Materials
HAWX
IFLO
Healthcare
HAWX
IFLO
Communication Services
HAWX
IFLO
Consumer Defensive
HAWX
IFLO
Energy
HAWX
IFLO
Utilities
HAWX
IFLO
Real Estate
HAWX
IFLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAWX vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank
HAWX
IFLO
HAWX vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAWX | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 5.17 | -2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.28 | 17.35 | -5.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAWX vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAWX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAWX and IFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAWX | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.63% | -6.44% | -24.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -6.44% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.49% | -1.89% | -2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -1.30% | -2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 1.92% | +0.47% |
Volatility
HAWX vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) at 3.18%. This indicates that HAWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAWX | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 3.18% | +2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 12.01% | +0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.68% | 14.55% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 14.51% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 14.51% | +0.76% |
HAWX vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAWX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAWX vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison
HAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than IFLO's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAWX iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.53% | 2.80% | 3.31% | 2.95% | 16.94% | 2.63% | 2.00% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.40% | 2.49% | 3.86% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.57% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAWX and IFLO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAWX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to IFLO (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAWX dropped -30.63% vs IFLO's -6.44%.
On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 33.15% vs 29.34% for HAWX. On fees, HAWX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IFLO has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 33.15% return vs 29.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HAWX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.
HAWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.57% for IFLO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HAWX and 0.56% for IFLO.
IFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAWX and IFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer