HAWX vs. IBIT

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

HAWX (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAWX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HAWX returned 32.32% vs -46.35% for IBIT. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HAWX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

HAWX vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAWX achieves a 16.07% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -26.32% return.

HAWX

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 0.43%
• 6M: 11.50%
• YTD: 16.07%
• 1Y: 32.32%
• 3Y*: 20.86%
• 5Y*: 12.86%
• 10Y*: 11.89%

IBIT

• 1D: 3.86%
• 1M: 1.50%
• 6M: -31.72%
• YTD: -26.32%
• 1Y: -46.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAWX vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HAWX iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	16.07%	26.24%	15.36%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-26.32%	-6.41%	89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between HAWX and IBIT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.35

Return for Risk

HAWX vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAWX

HAWX Risk / Return Rank: 85
HAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
HAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
HAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
HAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
HAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAWX vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HAWX	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	-1.05	+3.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	-1.58	+4.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	0.83	+0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	-0.87	+4.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.75	-1.41	+15.16

HAWX vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAWX and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HAWX vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAWX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAWX and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAWX	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.63%	-53.30%	+22.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.39%	-53.30%	+43.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.99%	-48.69%	+45.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-17.61%	+13.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	32.86%	-30.50%

Volatility

HAWX vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) is 5.30%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 11.82%. This indicates that HAWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAWX	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.30%	11.82%	-6.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.92%	35.03%	-22.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.61%	44.48%	-29.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.65%	49.99%	-36.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.27%	49.99%	-34.72%

HAWX vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAWX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAWX vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

HAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAWX iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	2.49%	2.80%	3.31%	2.95%	16.94%	2.63%	2.00%	3.23%	2.51%	2.40%	2.49%	3.86%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAWX and IBIT in my portfolio?

HAWX and IBIT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAWX or IBIT?

IBIT has higher volatility (11.82%) compared to HAWX (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAWX dropped -30.63% vs IBIT's -53.30%.

Which ETF is better, HAWX or IBIT?

On 1-year performance, HAWX leads with 32.32% vs -46.35% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HAWX has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HAWX or IBIT?

Over the 1-year period, HAWX has performed better with a 32.32% return vs -46.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAWX or IBIT?

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HAWX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAWX or IBIT?

HAWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between HAWX and IBIT?

HAWX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. HAWX tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HAWX and 0.25% for IBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.