PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAWX vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAWX vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAWX achieves a 16.31% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, HAWX has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 12.07%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.


HAWX

1D
0.20%
1M
5.06%
YTD
16.31%
6M
18.14%
1Y
35.60%
3Y*
21.62%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*
12.07%

ACWI

1D
0.30%
1M
4.45%
YTD
12.47%
6M
13.07%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAWX vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
16.31%26.24%14.88%17.05%-8.59%13.40%6.92%22.75%-9.77%19.21%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.47%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between HAWX and ACWI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2015

0.80

The correlation between HAWX and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

HAWX vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HAWX
ACWI

Financial Services

23.6%
16.1%

Technology

21.4%
29.4%

Industrials

13.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
9.3%

Healthcare

6.8%
8.1%

Basic Materials

6.6%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
5.0%

Energy

5.0%
4.2%

Communication Services

4.8%
9.0%

Utilities

2.8%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.8%

Financial Services

HAWX
23.6%
ACWI
16.1%

Technology

HAWX
21.4%
ACWI
29.4%

Industrials

HAWX
13.9%
ACWI
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HAWX
7.3%
ACWI
9.3%

Healthcare

HAWX
6.8%
ACWI
8.1%

Basic Materials

HAWX
6.6%
ACWI
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

HAWX
5.0%
ACWI
5.0%

Energy

HAWX
5.0%
ACWI
4.2%

Communication Services

HAWX
4.8%
ACWI
9.0%

Utilities

HAWX
2.8%
ACWI
2.6%

Real Estate

HAWX
1.2%
ACWI
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAWX vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAWX
HAWX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAWX vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HAWXACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.42

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

3.02

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.02

13.55

+2.47

HAWX vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAWX and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HAWXACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

2.30

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.71

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.75

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.43

+0.24

Drawdowns

HAWX vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAWX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAWX and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAWXACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.63%

-56.00%

+25.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-9.73%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.30%

-16.55%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.47%

-26.42%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.63%

-33.53%

+2.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.53%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-8.61%

+4.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

2.16%

+0.07%

Volatility

HAWX vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.83%. This indicates that HAWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAWXACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

3.83%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.10%

10.30%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

12.79%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.33%

16.05%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.19%

17.11%

-1.92%

HAWX vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAWX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAWX vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

HAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.41%2.80%3.31%2.95%16.94%2.63%2.00%3.23%2.51%2.40%2.49%3.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAWX and ACWI have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAWX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to ACWI (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAWX dropped -30.63% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.82% vs 12.07% for HAWX. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 12.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HAWX.

HAWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

HAWX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. HAWX tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HAWX and 0.32% for ACWI.

HAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAWX and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer