PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAUZ vs. PXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAUZ vs. PXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAUZ achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than PXF's 18.79% return. Over the past 10 years, HAUZ has underperformed PXF with an annualized return of 4.01%, while PXF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.26% annualized return.


HAUZ

1D
0.56%
1M
-3.21%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
1.03%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
7.69%
5Y*
-1.46%
10Y*
4.01%

PXF

1D
0.34%
1M
0.89%
YTD
18.79%
6M
20.98%
1Y
39.76%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
12.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAUZ vs. PXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
-0.58%22.70%-5.44%6.29%-22.24%9.82%-6.23%20.89%-9.12%27.52%
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
18.79%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between HAUZ and PXF is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013

0.64

The correlation between HAUZ and PXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HAUZ vs. PXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HAUZ
PXF

Real Estate

96.5%
1.8%

Industrials

1.3%
15.1%

Communication Services

1.2%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
10.2%

Financial Services

0.3%
19.7%

Utilities

0.1%
3.6%

Technology

0.1%
11.4%

Basic Materials

0.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

0.0%
7.2%

Energy

0.0%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
6.1%

Real Estate

HAUZ
96.5%
PXF
1.8%

Industrials

HAUZ
1.3%
PXF
15.1%

Communication Services

HAUZ
1.2%
PXF
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

HAUZ
0.3%
PXF
10.2%

Financial Services

HAUZ
0.3%
PXF
19.7%

Utilities

HAUZ
0.1%
PXF
3.6%

Technology

HAUZ
0.1%
PXF
11.4%

Basic Materials

HAUZ
0.1%
PXF
10.1%

Healthcare

HAUZ
0.0%
PXF
7.2%

Energy

HAUZ
0.0%
PXF
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

HAUZ
0.0%
PXF
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAUZ vs. PXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAUZ
HAUZ Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
HAUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
HAUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAUZ vs. PXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HAUZPXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.45

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

3.66

-3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.21

13.76

-12.55

HAUZ vs. PXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAUZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the PXF Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAUZ and PXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAUZ vs. PXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAUZ drawdown since its inception was -39.51%, smaller than the maximum PXF drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAUZ and PXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAUZPXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.51%

-64.74%

+25.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-10.91%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.88%

-14.06%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.26%

-26.82%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.51%

-41.59%

+2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.86%

-2.04%

-7.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-15.25%

+3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.04%

2.90%

+2.14%

Volatility

HAUZ vs. PXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) is 4.34%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that HAUZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAUZPXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

6.76%

-2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

13.95%

-2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

16.18%

-2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

16.62%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

18.07%

-1.10%

HAUZ vs. PXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAUZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PXF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAUZ vs. PXF - Dividend Comparison

HAUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than PXF's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
4.49%4.46%4.50%3.50%1.99%4.84%3.37%3.69%1.93%2.59%2.18%9.42%
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.12%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAUZ and PXF have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXF has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to HAUZ (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAUZ dropped -39.51% vs PXF's -64.74%.

On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 12.26% vs 4.01% for HAUZ. On fees, HAUZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, HAUZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 12.26% return vs 4.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HAUZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PXF.

HAUZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 3.12% for PXF.

HAUZ is categorized as REIT, while PXF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. HAUZ tracks iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index, while PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for HAUZ and 0.45% for PXF.

PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAUZ and PXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer