HAUS vs. RDOG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

HAUS (Residential REIT ETF) and RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) are both REIT funds. HAUS is actively managed, while RDOG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HAUS returned 8.32%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for RDOG. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HAUS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RDOG.

Performance

HAUS vs. RDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Residential REIT ETF (HAUS) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAUS achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly lower than RDOG's 14.68% return.

HAUS

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 4.13%
• 6M: 4.48%
• 1Y: 4.01%
• 3Y*: 8.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RDOG

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 3.37%
• YTD: 14.68%
• 6M: 15.68%
• 1Y: 21.50%
• 3Y*: 11.70%
• 5Y*: 2.37%
• 10Y*: 4.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAUS vs. RDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HAUS Residential REIT ETF	4.13%	-1.14%	15.93%	13.14%	-22.47%
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF	14.68%	0.95%	4.57%	10.38%	-17.96%

Correlation

The correlation between HAUS and RDOG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2022	0.84

The correlation between HAUS and RDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

HAUS vs. RDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAUS	RDOG
Real Estate	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HAUS vs. RDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAUS

HAUS Risk / Return Rank: 13
HAUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
HAUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
HAUS Omega Ratio Rank: 12
HAUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
HAUS Martin Ratio Rank: 15

RDOG

RDOG Risk / Return Rank: 42
RDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
RDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 38
RDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
RDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAUS vs. RDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Residential REIT ETF (HAUS) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HAUS	RDOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	1.49	-1.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.50	2.16	-1.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.25	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	2.14	-1.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.32	6.95	-5.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HAUS vs. RDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the RDOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAUS and RDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAUS	RDOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29	1.49	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.17	-0.11

Drawdowns

HAUS vs. RDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAUS drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, smaller than the maximum RDOG drawdown of -67.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAUS and RDOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAUS	RDOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.91%	-67.59%	+31.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.19%	-10.02%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.25%	-21.40%	+4.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.53%	-1.24%	-6.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.74%	-12.26%	-5.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	3.09%	-0.05%

Volatility

HAUS vs. RDOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Residential REIT ETF (HAUS) is 3.44%, while ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that HAUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAUS	RDOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.44%	4.15%	-0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.04%	10.43%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.04%	14.49%	-0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.51%	19.84%	-0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.51%	23.05%	-3.54%

HAUS vs. RDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAUS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RDOG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAUS vs. RDOG - Dividend Comparison

HAUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than RDOG's 6.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAUS Residential REIT ETF	3.48%	4.42%	2.08%	2.61%	2.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF	6.08%	6.91%	6.11%	7.07%	5.25%	3.11%	5.12%	3.10%	3.13%	3.64%	3.66%	3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAUS and RDOG in my portfolio?

HAUS and RDOG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAUS or RDOG?

RDOG has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to HAUS (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAUS dropped -35.91% vs RDOG's -67.59%.

Which ETF is better, HAUS or RDOG?

On 3-year performance, RDOG leads with 11.70% vs 8.32% for HAUS. On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HAUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HAUS or RDOG?

Over the 3-year period, RDOG has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAUS or RDOG?

RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HAUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAUS or RDOG?

RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 3.48% for HAUS.

What is the main difference between HAUS and RDOG?

They also come from different issuers: Armada ETF Advisors and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HAUS and 0.35% for RDOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.