HAUS vs. IGR
HAUS (Residential REIT ETF) and IGR (CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 3 years, HAUS returned 10.03%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for IGR. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HAUS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IGR.
Performance
HAUS vs. IGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAUS achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly lower than IGR's 10.92% return.
HAUS
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- 6.66%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 6.19%
- 3Y*
- 10.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGR
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 6M
- 15.12%
- 1Y
- 0.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.99%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
HAUS vs. IGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAUS Residential REIT ETF | 6.66% | -1.14% | 15.93% | 13.14% | -23.08% |
IGR CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund | 10.92% | 5.24% | 1.19% | 15.91% | -23.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAUS and IGR is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2022 | 0.66 |
The correlation between HAUS and IGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAUS vs. IGR — Risk / Return Rank
HAUS
IGR
HAUS vs. IGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Residential REIT ETF (HAUS) and CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAUS | IGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.02 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 0.04 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | 0.10 | +1.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAUS vs. IGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAUS drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, smaller than the maximum IGR drawdown of -87.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAUS and IGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAUS | IGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.91% | -87.17% | +51.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.19% | -16.14% | +7.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.25% | -29.54% | +12.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -11.71% | +6.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.57% | -24.46% | +6.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 6.59% | -3.62% |
Volatility
HAUS vs. IGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Residential REIT ETF (HAUS) is 4.57%, while CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that HAUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAUS | IGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 4.88% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.53% | 14.48% | -3.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.47% | 18.73% | -4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 24.77% | -5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 24.48% | -5.00% |
HAUS vs. IGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAUS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IGR's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAUS vs. IGR - Dividend Comparison
HAUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than IGR's 16.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAUS Residential REIT ETF | 3.40% | 4.42% | 2.08% | 2.61% | 2.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGR CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund | 16.00% | 16.44% | 14.97% | 15.38% | 12.22% | 6.13% | 8.72% | 7.48% | 9.74% | 7.58% | 8.84% | 7.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAUS and IGR have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGR has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to HAUS (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAUS dropped -35.91% vs IGR's -87.17%.
HAUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAUS and IGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer