PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HASGX vs. RYWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HASGX vs. RYWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund (HASGX) and Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HASGX achieves a 18.25% return, which is significantly higher than RYWCX's 17.14% return. Over the past 10 years, HASGX has outperformed RYWCX with an annualized return of 12.94%, while RYWCX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.12% annualized return.


HASGX

1D
0.89%
1M
3.06%
YTD
18.25%
6M
17.11%
1Y
34.77%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
12.94%

RYWCX

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
17.14%
6M
15.72%
1Y
28.02%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
2.50%
10Y*
7.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HASGX vs. RYWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HASGX
Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund
18.25%11.44%9.34%22.20%-25.60%9.40%38.54%42.39%-11.37%24.71%
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
17.14%7.76%7.20%17.03%-30.33%16.37%15.23%11.58%-9.55%15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between HASGX and RYWCX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

0.92

The correlation between HASGX and RYWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HASGX vs. RYWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HASGX
HASGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
HASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
HASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

RYWCX
RYWCX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RYWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
RYWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HASGX vs. RYWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund (HASGX) and Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HASGXRYWCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

3.48

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

11.36

+0.22

HASGX vs. RYWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HASGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the RYWCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HASGX and RYWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HASGXRYWCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.61

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.11

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.29

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.26

+0.15

Drawdowns

HASGX vs. RYWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HASGX drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, smaller than the maximum RYWCX drawdown of -60.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HASGX and RYWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HASGXRYWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.33%

-60.64%

+6.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.93%

-8.49%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.49%

-26.39%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.17%

-40.28%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.53%

-54.65%

+16.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-1.70%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.17%

-13.45%

+3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.59%

+0.60%

Volatility

HASGX vs. RYWCX - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund (HASGX) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) at 4.65%. This indicates that HASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HASGXRYWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

4.65%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.85%

13.35%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.13%

18.30%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.32%

22.87%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.16%

24.72%

-1.56%

HASGX vs. RYWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HASGX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than RYWCX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

HASGX vs. RYWCX - Dividend Comparison

HASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, while RYWCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HASGX
Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund
0.95%1.13%3.53%0.03%4.80%27.66%7.21%3.44%27.29%10.10%0.47%13.13%
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.52%0.00%0.00%59.93%0.00%0.00%9.26%3.92%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HASGX and RYWCX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HASGX has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to RYWCX (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HASGX dropped -54.33% vs RYWCX's -60.64%.

HASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HASGX and RYWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer