HASGX vs. FCPGX

In the year-to-date period, HASGX achieves a -5.15% return, which is significantly higher than FCPGX's -6.27% return. Over the past 10 years, HASGX has underperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of 7.95%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.41% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HASGX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund (HASGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HASGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HASGX and FCPGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than FCPGX's 1.46% yield.

The maximum HASGX drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, smaller than the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HASGX and FCPGX.

Harbor Small Cap Growth Fund (HASGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) have volatilities of 6.08% and 5.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.