HASCX vs. XSVM
Compare and contrast key facts about Harbor Small Cap Value Fund (HASCX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM).
HASCX is managed by Harbor. It was launched on Dec 14, 2001. XSVM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005.
Performance
HASCX vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HASCX vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HASCX Harbor Small Cap Value Fund | 11.47% | 3.78% | 10.93% | 15.18% | -9.59% | 14.55% | 13.15% | 28.97% | -16.16% | 21.63% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 6.63% | 7.47% | 2.30% | 20.20% | -13.63% | 56.36% | 5.08% | 30.01% | -12.33% | 3.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HASCX achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than XSVM's 6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, HASCX has underperformed XSVM with an annualized return of 10.57%, while XSVM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.22% annualized return.
HASCX
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- -6.39%
- YTD
- 11.47%
- 6M
- 14.12%
- 1Y
- 27.99%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
XSVM
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 6.63%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 22.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HASCX vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HASCX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HASCX vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank
HASCX
XSVM
HASCX vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Small Cap Value Fund (HASCX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HASCX | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 1.03 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 1.57 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.21 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 1.75 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.48 | 5.69 | +1.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HASCX | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.03 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.27 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.49 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.35 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between HASCX and XSVM is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HASCX vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison
HASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than XSVM's 1.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HASCX Harbor Small Cap Value Fund | 3.06% | 3.41% | 0.62% | 6.99% | 7.25% | 5.64% | 0.43% | 1.41% | 11.18% | 1.98% | 0.36% | 3.98% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.99% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Drawdowns
HASCX vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HASCX drawdown since its inception was -58.90%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HASCX and XSVM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HASCX | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.90% | -62.57% | +3.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.64% | -13.35% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.34% | -26.21% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.15% | -49.02% | +6.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.10% | -5.23% | -1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -11.65% | +3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.81% | 4.11% | -0.30% |
Volatility
HASCX vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison
Harbor Small Cap Value Fund (HASCX) has a higher volatility of 7.91% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) at 5.34%. This indicates that HASCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HASCX | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.91% | 5.34% | +2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.39% | 13.20% | +1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.62% | 22.34% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 22.98% | -2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 25.07% | -2.25% |