HARD vs. CMDT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HARD (Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both Commodities funds. HARD is actively managed, while CMDT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HARD returned 13.00%/yr vs 16.90%/yr for CMDT. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HARD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.

Performance

HARD vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HARD achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly lower than CMDT's 23.96% return.

HARD

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -9.01%
• YTD: 14.81%
• 6M: 14.73%
• 1Y: 24.26%
• 3Y*: 13.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMDT

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 23.96%
• 6M: 24.09%
• 1Y: 35.85%
• 3Y*: 16.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HARD vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HARD Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	14.81%	12.19%	20.48%	-5.63%
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	23.96%	12.78%	6.93%	5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between HARD and CMDT is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	0.51

The correlation between HARD and CMDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HARD vs. CMDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HARD	CMDT
Financial Services	26.7%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HARD vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HARD

HARD Risk / Return Rank: 29
HARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
HARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
HARD Omega Ratio Rank: 25
HARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
HARD Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CMDT

CMDT Risk / Return Rank: 88
CMDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CMDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CMDT Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CMDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CMDT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HARD vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HARD	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	2.92	-2.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	3.92	-2.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.50	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	8.03	-6.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.51	22.12	-17.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HARD vs. CMDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HARD Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the CMDT Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HARD and CMDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HARD	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	2.92	-2.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	1.32	-0.64

Drawdowns

HARD vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HARD drawdown since its inception was -13.51%, which is greater than CMDT's maximum drawdown of -9.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HARD and CMDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HARD	CMDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.51%	-9.69%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.38%	-4.49%	-7.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.51%	-9.69%	-3.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.38%	-2.86%	-7.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.47%	-2.69%	-2.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.39%	1.63%	+3.76%

Volatility

HARD vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD) has a higher volatility of 8.11% compared to PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) at 4.33%. This indicates that HARD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HARD	CMDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.11%	4.33%	+3.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.64%	10.30%	+11.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.47%	12.35%	+14.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.09%	12.21%	+6.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.09%	12.21%	+6.88%

HARD vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HARD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

HARD vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison

HARD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than CMDT's 2.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	2.44%	3.04%	8.80%	2.71%
HARD Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	2.61%	2.36%	3.51%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HARD and CMDT in my portfolio?

HARD and CMDT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HARD or CMDT?

HARD has higher volatility (8.11%) compared to CMDT (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HARD dropped -13.51% vs CMDT's -9.69%.

Which ETF is better, HARD or CMDT?

On 3-year performance, CMDT leads with 16.90% vs 13.00% for HARD. On fees, CMDT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CMDT has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HARD or CMDT?

Over the 3-year period, CMDT has performed better with a 16.90% return vs 13.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HARD or CMDT?

CMDT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HARD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HARD or CMDT?

HARD has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 2.44% for CMDT.

What is the main difference between HARD and CMDT?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HARD and 0.65% for CMDT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.