HAP vs. MGNR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) and MGNR (American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. HAP is passively managed, while MGNR is actively managed. Over the past year, HAP returned 46.66% vs 74.12% for MGNR. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HAP charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for MGNR.

Performance

HAP vs. MGNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly lower than MGNR's 25.90% return.

HAP

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 21.49%
• 6M: 23.70%
• 1Y: 46.66%
• 3Y*: 18.93%
• 5Y*: 11.51%
• 10Y*: 11.99%

MGNR

• 1D: -1.76%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 25.90%
• 6M: 27.71%
• 1Y: 74.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAP vs. MGNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	21.49%	34.91%	0.15%
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF	25.90%	50.57%	22.78%

Correlation

The correlation between HAP and MGNR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2024	0.82

The correlation between HAP and MGNR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HAP vs. MGNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAP

HAP Risk / Return Rank: 89
HAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
HAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
HAP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
HAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
HAP Martin Ratio Rank: 92

MGNR

MGNR Risk / Return Rank: 89
MGNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
MGNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MGNR Omega Ratio Rank: 86
MGNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
MGNR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAP vs. MGNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HAP	MGNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.14	3.24	-0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.01	3.77	+0.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.53	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.65	6.02	-0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	23.05	24.36	-1.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HAP vs. MGNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAP Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is comparable to the MGNR Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAP and MGNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAP	MGNR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.14	3.24	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	1.77	-1.51

Drawdowns

HAP vs. MGNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, which is greater than MGNR's maximum drawdown of -22.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and MGNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAP	MGNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.73%	-22.06%	-28.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-12.38%	+4.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.95%	-1.76%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.03%	-3.86%	-8.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	3.05%	-1.02%

Volatility

HAP vs. MGNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) is 4.37%, while American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that HAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAP	MGNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	6.59%	-2.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.24%	17.67%	-5.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.91%	23.04%	-8.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.24%	25.03%	-6.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.74%	25.03%	-5.29%

HAP vs. MGNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than MGNR's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAP vs. MGNR - Dividend Comparison

HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than MGNR's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	1.87%	2.27%	2.65%	3.27%	3.28%	2.16%	2.45%	2.80%	2.85%	2.02%	1.99%	3.00%
MGNR American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF	1.07%	1.17%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAP and MGNR in my portfolio?

HAP and MGNR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAP or MGNR?

MGNR has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to HAP (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAP dropped -50.73% vs MGNR's -22.06%.

Which ETF is better, HAP or MGNR?

On 1-year performance, MGNR leads with 74.12% vs 46.66% for HAP. On fees, HAP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, HAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HAP or MGNR?

Over the 1-year period, MGNR has performed better with a 74.12% return vs 46.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAP or MGNR?

HAP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MGNR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAP or MGNR?

HAP has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.07% for MGNR.

What is the main difference between HAP and MGNR?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and American Beacon. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for HAP and 0.75% for MGNR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 3.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.