HAP vs. FEOE
HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) and FEOE (First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index, while FEOE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by First Eagle. HAP is passively managed, while FEOE is actively managed. Over the past year, HAP returned 46.66% vs 32.06% for FEOE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HAP charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FEOE.
Performance
HAP vs. FEOE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly higher than FEOE's 11.79% return.
HAP
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 21.49%
- 6M
- 23.70%
- 1Y
- 46.66%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
FEOE
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 11.79%
- 6M
- 14.94%
- 1Y
- 32.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAP vs. FEOE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 21.49% | 34.91% | 0.79% |
FEOE First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF | 11.79% | 41.33% | -0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAP and FEOE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between HAP and FEOE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
HAP vs. FEOE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HAP
FEOE
Basic Materials
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
HAP
FEOE
Energy
HAP
FEOE
Industrials
HAP
FEOE
Utilities
HAP
FEOE
-
Consumer Defensive
HAP
FEOE
Healthcare
HAP
FEOE
Technology
HAP
FEOE
Real Estate
HAP
FEOE
Consumer Cyclical
HAP
FEOE
Communication Services
HAP
-
FEOE
Financial Services
HAP
-
FEOE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAP vs. FEOE — Risk / Return Rank
HAP
FEOE
HAP vs. FEOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF (FEOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAP | FEOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.40 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.65 | 2.62 | +3.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.05 | 9.34 | +13.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAP | FEOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14 | 2.24 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 2.38 | -2.12 |
Drawdowns
HAP vs. FEOE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, which is greater than FEOE's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and FEOE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAP | FEOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.73% | -12.27% | -38.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -12.27% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -2.86% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.03% | -1.78% | -10.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 3.44% | -1.41% |
Volatility
HAP vs. FEOE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) is 4.37%, while First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF (FEOE) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that HAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAP | FEOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 4.68% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 12.32% | -0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.91% | 14.41% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 15.63% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 15.63% | +4.11% |
HAP vs. FEOE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FEOE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAP vs. FEOE - Dividend Comparison
HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than FEOE's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEOE First Eagle Overseas Equity ETF | 1.37% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 1.87% | 2.27% | 2.65% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAP and FEOE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEOE has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to HAP (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAP dropped -50.73% vs FEOE's -12.27%.
On 1-year performance, HAP leads with 46.66% vs 32.06% for FEOE. On fees, HAP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, HAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HAP has performed better with a 46.66% return vs 32.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HAP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FEOE.
HAP has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.37% for FEOE.
HAP is categorized as Energy Equities, while FEOE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for HAP and 0.50% for FEOE.
HAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAP and FEOE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer