HAP vs. ENB.TO
HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index, while ENB.TO (Enbridge Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, HAP returned 11.95%/yr vs 9.65%/yr for ENB.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HAP vs. ENB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HAP is traded in USD, while ENB.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ENB.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a 18.44% return, which is significantly lower than ENB.TO's 20.96% return. Over the past 10 years, HAP has outperformed ENB.TO with an annualized return of 11.95%, while ENB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.65% annualized return.
HAP
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- 18.44%
- 6M
- 19.25%
- 1Y
- 38.39%
- 3Y*
- 17.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
ENB.TO
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 20.96%
- 6M
- 22.09%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
HAP vs. ENB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 18.44% | 34.91% | -4.08% | 2.46% | 7.84% | 25.04% | 6.30% | 18.60% | -10.68% | 17.12% |
ENB.TO Enbridge Inc. | 20.96% | 19.55% | 26.47% | -0.92% | 7.16% | 30.05% | -13.25% | 34.99% | -15.41% | -2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAP and ENB.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2008 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HAP and ENB.TO has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAP vs. ENB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HAP
ENB.TO
HAP vs. ENB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAP | ENB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.30 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | 3.18 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.71 | 7.85 | +9.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAP vs. ENB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than ENB.TO's maximum drawdown of -46.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and ENB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAP | ENB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -46.35% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -8.85% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.92% | -14.77% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -27.86% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.07% | -43.74% | -0.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.42% | -2.89% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.07% | -11.35% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 3.58% | -1.36% |
Volatility
HAP vs. ENB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) is 5.20%, while Enbridge Inc. (ENB.TO) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that HAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAP | ENB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 5.85% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.86% | 12.99% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.50% | 16.33% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 17.21% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 23.57% | -3.82% |
Dividends
HAP vs. ENB.TO - Dividend Comparison
HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than ENB.TO's 4.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENB.TO Enbridge Inc. | 4.84% | 5.74% | 6.00% | 7.44% | 6.50% | 6.76% | 7.96% | 5.72% | 6.33% | 4.91% | 3.75% | 4.04% |
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 1.91% | 2.27% | 2.65% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAP and ENB.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HAP and ENB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer