HAP vs. COLO
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO).
HAP and COLO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HAP is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Aug 29, 2008. COLO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2009. Both HAP and COLO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HAP vs. COLO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HAP vs. COLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 20.42% | 34.91% | -4.08% | 2.46% | 7.84% | 25.04% | 6.30% | 18.60% | -10.68% | 17.12% |
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF | 11.42% | 68.88% | 4.68% | 24.92% | -21.32% | -11.50% | -14.60% | 30.42% | -19.88% | 11.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly higher than COLO's 11.42% return. Over the past 10 years, HAP has outperformed COLO with an annualized return of 12.74%, while COLO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.56% annualized return.
HAP
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 29.48%
- 1Y
- 48.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
COLO
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 6.29%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 27.03%
- 1Y
- 52.95%
- 3Y*
- 36.24%
- 5Y*
- 13.86%
- 10Y*
- 5.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HAP vs. COLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than COLO's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HAP vs. COLO — Risk / Return Rank
HAP
COLO
HAP vs. COLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAP | COLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.56 | 2.34 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.18 | 2.90 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.41 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 3.42 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.71 | 11.23 | +7.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAP | COLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 2.34 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.61 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.22 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.22 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between HAP and COLO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HAP vs. COLO - Dividend Comparison
HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than COLO's 6.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 1.88% | 2.27% | 2.65% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% |
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF | 6.74% | 7.51% | 6.08% | 6.99% | 12.55% | 2.32% | 3.23% | 3.04% | 3.03% | 1.83% | 1.48% | 1.58% |
Drawdowns
HAP vs. COLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, smaller than the maximum COLO drawdown of -78.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and COLO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAP | COLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.73% | -78.91% | +28.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.50% | -16.37% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -43.86% | +18.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.07% | -62.75% | +18.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -24.36% | +21.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -40.47% | +28.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 4.99% | -2.39% |
Volatility
HAP vs. COLO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) is 5.40%, while Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that HAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HAP | COLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 6.17% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 16.84% | -4.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.95% | 22.77% | -3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 22.98% | -4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 25.34% | -5.53% |