COLO vs. GVAL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

COLO (Global X MSCI Colombia ETF) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COLO is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index, while GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. COLO is passively managed, while GVAL is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, COLO returned 6.90%/yr vs 11.81%/yr for GVAL. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COLO charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.

Performance

COLO vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COLO achieves a 24.05% return, which is significantly higher than GVAL's 17.40% return. Over the past 10 years, COLO has underperformed GVAL with an annualized return of 6.90%, while GVAL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.81% annualized return.

COLO

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 18.56%
• YTD: 24.05%
• 6M: 25.08%
• 1Y: 62.41%
• 3Y*: 37.23%
• 5Y*: 17.49%
• 10Y*: 6.90%

GVAL

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: 4.28%
• YTD: 17.40%
• 6M: 17.33%
• 1Y: 43.62%
• 3Y*: 27.44%
• 5Y*: 14.14%
• 10Y*: 11.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COLO vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF	24.05%	68.88%	4.68%	24.92%	-21.32%	-11.50%	-14.60%	30.42%	-19.88%	11.88%
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	17.40%	55.87%	2.59%	13.30%	-7.98%	10.70%	-8.51%	17.24%	-14.30%	29.50%

Correlation

The correlation between COLO and GVAL is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014	0.58

The correlation between COLO and GVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

COLO vs. GVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	COLO	GVAL
Financial Services	39.3%	16.9%
Basic Materials	18.5%	7.7%
Utilities	17.5%	3.7%
Energy	17.1%	6.8%
Communication Services	3.5%	4.3%
Industrials	2.5%	3.6%
Consumer Cyclical	1.6%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	6.2%
Technology	-	9.4%

Return for Risk

COLO vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COLO

COLO Risk / Return Rank: 76
COLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
COLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
COLO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
COLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
COLO Martin Ratio Rank: 56

GVAL

GVAL Risk / Return Rank: 84
GVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
GVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COLO vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COLO	GVAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	2.82	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	3.72	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.50	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.53	3.81	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.54	14.52	-4.98

COLO vs. GVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COLO Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the GVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLO and GVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COLO vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLO drawdown since its inception was -78.91%, which is greater than GVAL's maximum drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLO and GVAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	COLO	GVAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.91%	-46.82%	-32.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.79%	-11.50%	-6.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.35%	-15.72%	-2.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.86%	-30.83%	-13.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.75%	-46.82%	-15.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.79%	-2.31%	-13.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.26%	-13.82%	-26.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.56%	3.01%	+3.55%

Volatility

COLO vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) has a higher volatility of 10.98% compared to Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) at 6.37%. This indicates that COLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COLO	GVAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.98%	6.37%	+4.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.27%	13.81%	+6.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.13%	15.55%	+7.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.37%	18.60%	+4.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.46%	19.00%	+6.46%

COLO vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

COLO has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

COLO vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison

COLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.05%, more than GVAL's 2.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF	6.05%	7.51%	6.08%	6.99%	12.55%	2.32%	3.23%	3.04%	3.03%	1.83%	1.48%	1.58%
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	2.43%	2.93%	4.75%	6.12%	5.05%	2.97%	1.90%	2.84%	4.65%	2.00%	2.54%	2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COLO and GVAL in my portfolio?

COLO and GVAL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COLO or GVAL?

COLO has higher volatility (10.98%) compared to GVAL (6.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COLO dropped -78.91% vs GVAL's -46.82%.

Which ETF is better, COLO or GVAL?

On 10-year performance, GVAL leads with 11.81% vs 6.90% for COLO. On fees, COLO is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, GVAL has been the lower-risk option at 6.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COLO or GVAL?

Over the 10-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 6.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COLO or GVAL?

COLO is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COLO or GVAL?

COLO has the higher dividend yield at 6.05%, compared with 2.43% for GVAL.

What is the main difference between COLO and GVAL?

COLO is categorized as Latin America Equities, while GVAL is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for COLO and 0.64% for GVAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.