HAIL vs. GLD
HAIL (SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - HAIL is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HAIL returned -4.71%/yr vs 18.15%/yr for GLD. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HAIL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
HAIL vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAIL achieves a 34.24% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return.
HAIL
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- 18.49%
- YTD
- 34.24%
- 6M
- 34.66%
- 1Y
- 65.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- -4.71%
- 10Y*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
HAIL vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 34.24% | 19.62% | -6.98% | 9.65% | -45.72% | 1.95% | 84.33% | 30.63% | -19.96% | -0.65% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAIL and GLD is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017 | 0.10 |
The correlation between HAIL and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HAIL vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HAIL
GLD
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
HAIL
GLD
-
Technology
HAIL
GLD
-
Industrials
HAIL
GLD
-
Communication Services
HAIL
GLD
-
Energy
HAIL
GLD
-
Financial Services
HAIL
GLD
-
Basic Materials
HAIL
GLD
Consumer Defensive
HAIL
-
GLD
-
Healthcare
HAIL
-
GLD
-
Real Estate
HAIL
-
GLD
-
Utilities
HAIL
-
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAIL vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
HAIL
GLD
HAIL vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAIL | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.26 | 1.21 | +1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | 1.60 | +1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 1.68 | +1.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.42 | 4.15 | +6.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAIL | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 1.21 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 1.01 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.60 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
HAIL vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAIL drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAIL and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAIL | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.98% | -45.56% | -20.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.64% | -19.21% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.96% | -19.21% | -21.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.12% | -21.03% | -42.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.19% | -17.75% | -11.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.60% | -16.16% | -15.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.15% | 7.73% | -1.58% |
Volatility
HAIL vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) has a higher volatility of 10.46% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.51%. This indicates that HAIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAIL | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.46% | 5.51% | +4.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 23.16% | -0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.23% | 26.61% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.79% | 18.00% | +13.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.73% | 15.95% | +15.78% |
HAIL vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAIL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAIL vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
HAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 1.41% | 2.00% | 2.98% | 2.62% | 2.09% | 1.36% | 0.52% | 1.17% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAIL and GLD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAIL has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to GLD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAIL dropped -65.98% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 5-year performance, GLD leads with 18.15% vs -4.71% for HAIL. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLD has performed better with a 18.15% return vs -4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HAIL.
HAIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
HAIL is categorized as Global Equities, while GLD is Gold. HAIL tracks S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HAIL and 0.40% for GLD.
HAIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAIL and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer