HAIL vs. AVOS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

HAIL (SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF) and AVOS (Avos Global Equities ETF) are both Global Equities funds. HAIL is passively managed, while AVOS is actively managed. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HAIL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for AVOS.

Performance

HAIL vs. AVOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) and Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HAIL

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: -3.51%
• 6M: 7.47%
• YTD: 11.97%
• 1Y: 24.40%
• 3Y*: 2.93%
• 5Y*: -6.32%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.40%

AVOS

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 1.35%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF	$81.87K	$59.91K	$103.00K
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF	$27.63K	$158.03K	$150.74K

HAIL vs. AVOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF	10.70%
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF	11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between HAIL and AVOS is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026	0.74

HAIL vs. AVOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAIL	AVOS
Technology	37.8%	21.2%
Consumer Cyclical	36.2%	8.2%
Industrials	20.3%	11.7%
Communication Services	4.0%	8.4%
Financial Services	3.1%	18.6%
Basic Materials	0.8%	6.3%
Energy	0.8%	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.7%
Healthcare	-	8.8%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	3.0%

Return for Risk

HAIL vs. AVOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HAIL

HAIL Risk / Return Rank: 31
HAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
HAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
HAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 30
HAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
HAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 31

AVOS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HAIL vs. AVOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) and Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HAIL	AVOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.90	—	—

Drawdowns

HAIL vs. AVOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAIL drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than AVOS's maximum drawdown of -4.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAIL and AVOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAIL	AVOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.98%	-4.66%	-61.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.94%	0.00%	-40.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.73%	-1.31%	-30.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.43%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HAIL	AVOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.36%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.47%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.00%	17.11%	+14.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.33%	17.11%	+15.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.88%	17.11%	+14.77%

HAIL vs. AVOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAIL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AVOS's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAIL vs. AVOS - Dividend Comparison

HAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while AVOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF	1.71%	2.00%	2.98%	2.62%	2.09%	1.36%	0.52%	1.17%	2.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAIL and AVOS in my portfolio?

HAIL and AVOS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HAIL or AVOS?

On fees, HAIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAIL or AVOS?

HAIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for AVOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAIL or AVOS?

HAIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.00% for AVOS.

What is the main difference between HAIL and AVOS?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avos. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HAIL and 0.64% for AVOS.