HADAX vs. EKBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Balanced HLS Fund (HADAX) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX).
HADAX is managed by Hartford. It was launched on Mar 30, 1983. EKBAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 19, 1998.
Performance
HADAX vs. EKBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HADAX vs. EKBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HADAX Hartford Balanced HLS Fund | -5.33% | 12.10% | 11.30% | 14.79% | -13.70% | 19.69% | 11.54% | 22.68% | -5.35% | 15.59% |
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 4.55% | 21.87% | 21.75% | 22.23% | -13.47% | 19.61% | 12.66% | 32.99% | -5.55% | 14.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HADAX achieves a -5.33% return, which is significantly lower than EKBAX's 4.55% return. Over the past 10 years, HADAX has underperformed EKBAX with an annualized return of 8.14%, while EKBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.80% annualized return.
HADAX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -5.55%
- YTD
- -5.33%
- 6M
- -2.33%
- 1Y
- 7.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
EKBAX
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -6.94%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 36.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HADAX vs. EKBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HADAX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than EKBAX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HADAX vs. EKBAX — Risk / Return Rank
HADAX
EKBAX
HADAX vs. EKBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Balanced HLS Fund (HADAX) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HADAX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.66 | 1.80 | -1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 2.37 | -1.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.38 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 2.64 | -1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.53 | 12.94 | -9.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HADAX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 1.80 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.78 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.80 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.46 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between HADAX and EKBAX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HADAX vs. EKBAX - Dividend Comparison
HADAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.57%, more than EKBAX's 9.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HADAX Hartford Balanced HLS Fund | 12.57% | 11.90% | 9.05% | 4.62% | 17.33% | 6.29% | 6.62% | 10.54% | 7.27% | 2.29% | 2.80% | 1.95% |
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 9.20% | 9.61% | 5.28% | 6.16% | 12.50% | 6.89% | 2.03% | 9.49% | 7.14% | 6.20% | 10.05% | 11.47% |
Drawdowns
HADAX vs. EKBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HADAX drawdown since its inception was -91.68%, which is greater than EKBAX's maximum drawdown of -55.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HADAX and EKBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HADAX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.68% | -55.64% | -36.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.27% | -13.29% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.82% | -24.84% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.36% | -32.33% | +5.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.89% | -7.32% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.51% | -8.03% | -16.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 2.71% | -0.86% |
Volatility
HADAX vs. EKBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Balanced HLS Fund (HADAX) is 3.05%, while Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that HADAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HADAX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 5.70% | -2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.58% | 12.79% | -6.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 20.75% | -9.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.93% | 17.86% | -6.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.89% | 17.40% | -5.51% |