HACAX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
HACAX is managed by Harbor. It was launched on Dec 29, 1987. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
HACAX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HACAX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACAX Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I | -14.13% | 13.95% | 46.37% | 53.74% | -37.72% | 15.32% | 54.69% | 33.42% | -1.30% | -0.44% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HACAX achieves a -14.13% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
HACAX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -8.90%
- YTD
- -14.13%
- 6M
- -13.44%
- 1Y
- 8.81%
- 3Y*
- 23.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 16.39%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HACAX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HACAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HACAX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
HACAX
SWLGX
HACAX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HACAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 0.66 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.71 | 1.10 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.15 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | 0.72 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | 2.51 | -1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HACAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 0.66 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.56 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.68 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between HACAX and SWLGX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HACAX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
HACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.10%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACAX Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I | 13.10% | 11.25% | 21.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.64% | 12.25% | 8.88% | 10.97% | 11.56% | 6.26% | 6.83% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HACAX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HACAX drawdown since its inception was -63.05%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACAX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HACAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.05% | -32.69% | -30.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.96% | -16.16% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.52% | -32.69% | -10.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.96% | -16.16% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.27% | -7.13% | -9.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.36% | 4.62% | +0.74% |
Volatility
HACAX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.38%. This indicates that HACAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HACAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 5.38% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.59% | 11.82% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.13% | 22.31% | -2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.89% | 21.47% | +4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.31% | 22.78% | +1.53% |