HACAX vs. NFE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX) and New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE).

HACAX is managed by Harbor. It was launched on Dec 29, 1987.

Performance

HACAX vs. NFE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX) and New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HACAX vs. NFE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HACAX Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I	-14.13%	13.95%	46.37%	53.74%	-37.72%	15.32%	54.69%	21.14%
NFE New Fortress Energy Inc.	-48.25%	-92.46%	-59.24%	-1.71%	77.41%	-54.42%	243.98%	19.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HACAX achieves a -14.13% return, which is significantly higher than NFE's -48.25% return.

HACAX

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -8.90%
• YTD: -14.13%
• 6M: -13.44%
• 1Y: 8.81%
• 3Y*: 23.01%
• 5Y*: 10.36%
• 10Y*: 16.39%

NFE

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -45.87%
• YTD: -48.25%
• 6M: -73.30%
• 1Y: -92.90%
• 3Y*: -72.60%
• 5Y*: -57.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HACAX vs. NFE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HACAX

HACAX Risk / Return Rank: 15
HACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
HACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
HACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
HACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

NFE

NFE Risk / Return Rank: 11
NFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
NFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
NFE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
NFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFE Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HACAX vs. NFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX) and New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HACAX	NFE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	-0.60	+1.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	-1.11	+1.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	0.86	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.32	-1.00	+1.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.07	-1.27	+2.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HACAX vs. NFE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HACAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is higher than the NFE Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HACAX and NFE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HACAX	NFE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43	-0.60	+1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	-0.65	+1.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	-0.41	+0.99

Correlation

The correlation between HACAX and NFE is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HACAX vs. NFE - Dividend Comparison

HACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.10%, while NFE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HACAX Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I	13.10%	11.25%	21.75%	0.00%	0.00%	18.64%	12.25%	8.88%	10.97%	11.56%	6.26%	6.83%
NFE New Fortress Energy Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	1.98%	10.46%	0.94%	1.66%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HACAX vs. NFE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HACAX drawdown since its inception was -63.05%, smaller than the maximum NFE drawdown of -98.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACAX and NFE.

Drawdown Indicators

	HACAX	NFE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.05%	-98.94%	+35.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.96%	-93.26%	+75.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.52%	-98.94%	+55.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.96%	-98.92%	+80.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.27%	-44.72%	+28.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.36%	73.56%	-68.20%

Volatility

HACAX vs. NFE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX) is 5.67%, while New Fortress Energy Inc. (NFE) has a volatility of 33.62%. This indicates that HACAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HACAX	NFE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.67%	33.62%	-27.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.59%	78.90%	-66.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.13%	154.63%	-134.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.89%	89.13%	-63.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.31%	83.59%	-59.28%