H4Z6.DE vs. CNAA.DE
H4Z6.DE (HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CNAA.DE (Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc) are both China Equities funds - H4Z6.DE tracks the MSCI China while CNAA.DE tracks the MSCI China A. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, H4Z6.DE returned 7.78%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for CNAA.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. H4Z6.DE charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CNAA.DE.
Performance
H4Z6.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, H4Z6.DE achieves a -6.53% return, which is significantly lower than CNAA.DE's 9.91% return.
H4Z6.DE
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -3.35%
- YTD
- -6.53%
- 6M
- -9.01%
- 1Y
- 2.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNAA.DE
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 33.60%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- —
H4Z6.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H4Z6.DE HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -6.53% | 16.48% | 27.04% | -14.63% | -10.19% |
CNAA.DE Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc | 9.91% | 10.09% | 19.81% | -17.19% | -13.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between H4Z6.DE and CNAA.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2022 | 0.73 |
The correlation between H4Z6.DE and CNAA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
H4Z6.DE vs. CNAA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
H4Z6.DE
CNAA.DE
H4Z6.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE) and Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| H4Z6.DE | CNAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.37 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 5.08 | -4.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | 13.52 | -13.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| H4Z6.DE | CNAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 2.04 | -1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.29 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
H4Z6.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum H4Z6.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.47%, smaller than the maximum CNAA.DE drawdown of -43.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4Z6.DE and CNAA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| H4Z6.DE | CNAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.47% | -43.90% | +10.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.85% | -6.65% | -10.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.47% | -27.84% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.82% | -11.33% | -3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.91% | -19.23% | +5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.17% | 2.50% | +5.67% |
Volatility
H4Z6.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) at 6.13%. This indicates that H4Z6.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNAA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| H4Z6.DE | CNAA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 6.13% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.11% | 11.38% | +1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 16.52% | +2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.28% | 21.44% | +3.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.28% | 22.51% | +2.77% |
H4Z6.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
H4Z6.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAA.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
H4Z6.DE vs. CNAA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither H4Z6.DE nor CNAA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
H4Z6.DE and CNAA.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, H4Z6.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H4Z6.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CNAA.DE.
H4Z6.DE tracks MSCI China, while CNAA.DE tracks MSCI China A. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for H4Z6.DE and 0.35% for CNAA.DE.
Find the right allocation for H4Z6.DE and CNAA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer