H4Z6.DE vs. CEBG.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE).
H4Z6.DE and CEBG.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. H4Z6.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China. It was launched on Jul 12, 2022. CEBG.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MarketGrader New China ESG. It was launched on Aug 25, 2010. Both H4Z6.DE and CEBG.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
H4Z6.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
H4Z6.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H4Z6.DE HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -6.01% | 16.48% | 27.04% | -14.63% | -10.19% |
CEBG.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | 10.05% | 38.75% | -22.52% | 33.05% | 5.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, H4Z6.DE achieves a -6.01% return, which is significantly lower than CEBG.DE's 10.05% return.
H4Z6.DE
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- -6.01%
- 6M
- -12.78%
- 1Y
- -2.09%
- 3Y*
- 4.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEBG.DE
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 18.76%
- 1Y
- 45.40%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.73%
- 10Y*
- 6.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
H4Z6.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
H4Z6.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than CEBG.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
H4Z6.DE vs. CEBG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
H4Z6.DE
CEBG.DE
H4Z6.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| H4Z6.DE | CEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | 2.03 | -2.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.01 | 2.69 | -2.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.36 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 3.54 | -3.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 13.03 | -13.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| H4Z6.DE | CEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 2.03 | -2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.24 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between H4Z6.DE and CEBG.DE is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
H4Z6.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither H4Z6.DE nor CEBG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
H4Z6.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum H4Z6.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.47%, smaller than the maximum CEBG.DE drawdown of -53.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4Z6.DE and CEBG.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| H4Z6.DE | CEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.47% | -53.49% | +20.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.21% | -12.76% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.35% | -3.98% | -10.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.93% | -15.17% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 3.47% | +3.12% |
Volatility
H4Z6.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE) is 6.12%, while VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) has a volatility of 9.38%. This indicates that H4Z6.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEBG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| H4Z6.DE | CEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 9.38% | -3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.41% | 15.72% | -2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.49% | 22.29% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.47% | 20.86% | +4.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.47% | 24.12% | +1.35% |