GZPZY vs. NATKY
GZPZY (Gaztransport & Technigaz SA) and NATKY (JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — GZPZY in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, NATKY in Uranium. Over the past 3 years, GZPZY returned 43.12%/yr vs 42.74%/yr for NATKY. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GZPZY vs. NATKY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GZPZY achieves a 27.87% return, which is significantly lower than NATKY's 40.78% return.
GZPZY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 27.87%
- 6M
- 27.87%
- 1Y
- 24.30%
- 3Y*
- 43.12%
- 5Y*
- 26.57%
- 10Y*
- —
NATKY
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 40.78%
- 6M
- 41.95%
- 1Y
- 66.01%
- 3Y*
- 42.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GZPZY vs. NATKY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GZPZY Gaztransport & Technigaz SA | 27.87% | 48.62% | -0.28% | 35.16% | -21.28% |
NATKY JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom | 40.78% | 35.10% | -2.26% | 61.84% | -11.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GZPZY and NATKY is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2022 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
GZPZY:
$8.66B
NATKY:
$18.62B
GZPZY:
€4.09
NATKY:
KZT 2.07K
GZPZY:
9.97
NATKY:
16.92
GZPZY:
0.29
NATKY:
0.28
GZPZY:
5.26
NATKY:
5.26
GZPZY:
12.89
NATKY:
3.96
GZPZY:
€1.44B
NATKY:
KZT 1.73T
GZPZY:
€1.26B
NATKY:
KZT 822.28B
GZPZY:
€868.11M
NATKY:
KZT 986.14B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GZPZY vs. NATKY — Risk / Return Rank
GZPZY
NATKY
GZPZY vs. NATKY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gaztransport & Technigaz SA (GZPZY) and JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom (NATKY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GZPZY | NATKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.37 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 2.42 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.42 | 6.20 | -0.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GZPZY vs. NATKY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GZPZY drawdown since its inception was -32.48%, which is greater than NATKY's maximum drawdown of -29.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GZPZY and NATKY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GZPZY | NATKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.48% | -29.45% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -27.39% | +18.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.31% | -29.45% | +14.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.45% | -22.76% | +20.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.97% | -8.60% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.51% | 10.68% | -6.17% |
Volatility
GZPZY vs. NATKY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gaztransport & Technigaz SA (GZPZY) is 7.79%, while JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom (NATKY) has a volatility of 16.79%. This indicates that GZPZY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NATKY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GZPZY | NATKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.79% | 16.79% | -9.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.44% | 40.07% | -19.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.52% | 49.24% | -23.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.44% | 39.59% | -10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.79% | 39.59% | -10.80% |
Dividends
GZPZY vs. NATKY - Dividend Comparison
GZPZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, while NATKY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GZPZY Gaztransport & Technigaz SA | 4.47% | 4.83% | 4.97% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 3.19% |
NATKY JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.27% | 4.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GZPZY vs. NATKY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gaztransport & Technigaz SA and JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GZPZY vs. NATKY - Profitability Comparison
GZPZY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaztransport & Technigaz SA reported a gross profit of 267.30M and revenue of 411.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.0%.
NATKY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom reported a gross profit of 45.57B and revenue of 146.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.
GZPZY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaztransport & Technigaz SA reported an operating income of 269.14M and revenue of 411.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 65.5%.
NATKY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom reported an operating income of 31.69B and revenue of 146.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
GZPZY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaztransport & Technigaz SA reported a net income of 231.91M and revenue of 411.24M, resulting in a net margin of 56.4%.
NATKY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom reported a net income of -7.48B and revenue of 146.34B, resulting in a net margin of -5.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GZPZY and NATKY have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NATKY has higher volatility (16.79%) compared to GZPZY (7.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GZPZY dropped -32.48% vs NATKY's -29.45%.
NATKY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GZPZY and NATKY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer