PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GZPZY vs. SCMWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GZPZY vs. SCMWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gaztransport & Technigaz SA (GZPZY) and SwissCom AG (SCMWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GZPZY achieves a 27.87% return, which is significantly higher than SCMWY's 11.72% return.


GZPZY

1D
0.00%
1M
4.56%
YTD
27.87%
6M
27.87%
1Y
24.30%
3Y*
43.12%
5Y*
26.57%
10Y*

SCMWY

1D
-0.12%
1M
-10.06%
YTD
11.72%
6M
13.37%
1Y
16.97%
3Y*
14.16%
5Y*
11.60%
10Y*
11.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GZPZY vs. SCMWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GZPZY
Gaztransport & Technigaz SA
27.87%48.62%-0.28%35.16%16.13%-0.66%0.00%
SCMWY
SwissCom AG
11.72%35.49%1.05%13.81%1.30%9.86%0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GZPZY and SCMWY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GZPZY:

$8.66B

SCMWY:

$40.49B

EPS

GZPZY:

€4.09

SCMWY:

CHF 2.40

PE Ratio

GZPZY:

9.97

SCMWY:

26.34

PS Ratio

GZPZY:

5.26

SCMWY:

2.19

PB Ratio

GZPZY:

12.89

SCMWY:

2.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

GZPZY:

€1.44B

SCMWY:

CHF 14.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GZPZY:

€1.26B

SCMWY:

CHF 10.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

GZPZY:

€868.11M

SCMWY:

CHF 5.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GZPZY vs. SCMWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GZPZY
GZPZY Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GZPZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GZPZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
GZPZY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GZPZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GZPZY Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SCMWY
SCMWY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SCMWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCMWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCMWY Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SCMWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCMWY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GZPZY vs. SCMWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gaztransport & Technigaz SA (GZPZY) and SwissCom AG (SCMWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GZPZYSCMWYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.16

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

1.29

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

4.05

+1.37

GZPZY vs. SCMWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GZPZY Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the SCMWY Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GZPZY and SCMWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GZPZY vs. SCMWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GZPZY drawdown since its inception was -32.48%, roughly equal to the maximum SCMWY drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GZPZY and SCMWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GZPZYSCMWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.48%

-33.75%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-13.20%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

-16.68%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.48%

-26.82%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-13.20%

+10.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-8.52%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.51%

4.20%

+0.31%

Volatility

GZPZY vs. SCMWY - Volatility Comparison

Gaztransport & Technigaz SA (GZPZY) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to SwissCom AG (SCMWY) at 5.00%. This indicates that GZPZY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCMWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GZPZYSCMWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.79%

5.00%

+2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.44%

14.42%

+6.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.52%

18.96%

+6.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.44%

17.58%

+11.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.79%

17.37%

+11.42%

Dividends

GZPZY vs. SCMWY - Dividend Comparison

GZPZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than SCMWY's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GZPZY
Gaztransport & Technigaz SA
4.47%4.83%4.97%2.66%2.26%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCMWY
SwissCom AG
4.32%3.44%8.77%3.99%4.30%4.38%4.28%4.13%4.91%8.30%9.75%4.60%

Financials

GZPZY vs. SCMWY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gaztransport & Technigaz SA and SwissCom AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B202120222023202420252026
411.24M
3.69B
(GZPZY) Total Revenue
(SCMWY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GZPZY values in EUR, SCMWY values in CHF

GZPZY vs. SCMWY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gaztransport & Technigaz SA and SwissCom AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
65.0%
28.0%
Portfolio components
GZPZY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaztransport & Technigaz SA reported a gross profit of 267.30M and revenue of 411.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.0%.

SCMWY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SwissCom AG reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 3.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.0%.

GZPZY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaztransport & Technigaz SA reported an operating income of 269.14M and revenue of 411.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 65.5%.

SCMWY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SwissCom AG reported an operating income of 618.49M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

GZPZY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaztransport & Technigaz SA reported a net income of 231.91M and revenue of 411.24M, resulting in a net margin of 56.4%.

SCMWY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SwissCom AG reported a net income of 339.41M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GZPZY and SCMWY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GZPZY has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to SCMWY (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GZPZY dropped -32.48% vs SCMWY's -33.75%.

GZPZY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GZPZY and SCMWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer