GXUS vs. GPIQ
GXUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXUS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. GXUS is passively managed, while GPIQ is actively managed. Over the past year, GXUS returned 29.85% vs 27.26% for GPIQ. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GXUS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.
Performance
GXUS vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GXUS having a 16.78% return and GPIQ slightly lower at 16.20%.
GXUS
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 9.60%
- YTD
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- 29.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.42%
GPIQ
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 15.14%
- YTD
- 16.20%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 27.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $93.95M | $83.10M | $83.77M | |
| $81.19K | $314.40K | $132.80K |
GXUS vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GXUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF | 16.78% | 31.47% | 4.61% | 13.73% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 16.20% | 19.77% | 23.22% | 15.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXUS and GPIQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.66 |
The correlation between GXUS and GPIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXUS vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
GXUS
GPIQ
GXUS vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXUS | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.88 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.79 | 10.14 | -0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXUS vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXUS drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, smaller than the maximum GPIQ drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXUS and GPIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXUS | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -21.06% | +7.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | -9.51% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.07% | +2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -2.34% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.69% | +0.37% |
Volatility
GXUS vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) is 5.19%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that GXUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXUS | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 6.84% | -1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.23% | 14.33% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.15% | 16.84% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 18.12% | -2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 18.12% | -2.53% |
GXUS vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXUS vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
GXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than GPIQ's 9.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.88% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% |
GXUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.87% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXUS and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPIQ has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to GXUS (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXUS dropped -13.90% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.
On 1-year performance, GXUS leads with 29.85% vs 27.26% for GPIQ. On fees, GXUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, GXUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GXUS has performed better with a 29.85% return vs 27.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GXUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIQ.
GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.88%, compared with 2.25% for GXUS.
GXUS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for GXUS and 0.29% for GPIQ.
GXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXUS and GPIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer