GXRP vs. ZCSH

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

GXRP (Grayscale XRP Trust ETF) and ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale - GXRP tracks the CoinDesk XRP Reference Rate Index while ZCSH tracks the Zcash (ZEC). Both are passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXRP charges 0.35%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ZCSH.

Performance

GXRP vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale XRP Trust ETF (GXRP) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXRP achieves a -39.61% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's 23.43% return.

GXRP

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -2.41%
• 6M: -47.00%
• YTD: -39.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZCSH

• 1D: 4.18%
• 1M: 38.89%
• 6M: 43.78%
• YTD: 23.43%
• 1Y: 910.56%
• 3Y*: 160.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXRP vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GXRP Grayscale XRP Trust ETF	-39.61%	-11.43%
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)	23.43%	-4.73%

Correlation

The correlation between GXRP and ZCSH is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025	0.55

Return for Risk

GXRP vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXRP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZCSH

ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 96
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXRP vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale XRP Trust ETF (GXRP) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GXRP	ZCSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	5.93	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.93	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.47	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	14.88	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	27.30	—

Drawdowns

GXRP vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXRP drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXRP and ZCSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXRP	ZCSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.43%	-93.73%	+38.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-69.62%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-71.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.29%	-26.38%	-25.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.41%	-73.69%	+40.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	37.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GXRP	ZCSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	37.34%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	106.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.76%	174.69%	-102.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.76%	138.06%	-66.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.76%	138.06%	-66.30%

GXRP vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXRP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXRP vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison

Neither GXRP nor ZCSH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXRP and ZCSH in my portfolio?

GXRP and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GXRP or ZCSH?

On fees, GXRP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXRP or ZCSH?

GXRP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXRP or ZCSH?

GXRP and ZCSH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GXRP and ZCSH?

GXRP tracks CoinDesk XRP Reference Rate Index, while ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC). Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GXRP and 2.50% for ZCSH.