GXRP vs. EZPZ
GXRP (Grayscale XRP Trust ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - GXRP tracks the CoinDesk XRP Reference Rate Index while EZPZ tracks the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GXRP charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.
Performance
GXRP vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXRP achieves a -39.61% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -29.86% return.
GXRP
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- 6M
- -47.00%
- YTD
- -39.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- 6M
- -32.93%
- YTD
- -29.86%
- 1Y
- -46.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXRP vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXRP Grayscale XRP Trust ETF | -39.61% | -11.43% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -29.86% | 2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXRP and EZPZ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXRP vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
GXRP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZPZ
GXRP vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale XRP Trust ETF (GXRP) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXRP | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.85 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.79 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.28 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXRP vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXRP drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, roughly equal to the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -56.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXRP and EZPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXRP | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.43% | -56.63% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.29% | -52.70% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.41% | -23.97% | -9.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 34.85% | — |
Volatility
GXRP vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXRP | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.76% | 47.87% | +23.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.76% | 47.56% | +24.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.76% | 47.56% | +24.20% |
GXRP vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXRP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXRP vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither GXRP nor EZPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, GXRP and EZPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GXRP.
GXRP and EZPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GXRP tracks CoinDesk XRP Reference Rate Index, while EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GXRP and 0.19% for EZPZ.
Find the right allocation for GXRP and EZPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer