PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPS vs. NVDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPS vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPS achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly higher than NVDL's -2.11% return.


GXPS

1D
-1.22%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
9.20%
6M
8.61%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDL

1D
-3.04%
1M
-18.96%
YTD
-2.11%
6M
-4.57%
1Y
27.82%
3Y*
93.53%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPS vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPS and NVDL is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

-0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPS vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXPS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NVDL
NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPS vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXPSNVDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.44

GXPS vs. NVDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXPS vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPS drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum NVDL drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPS and NVDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPSNVDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-67.55%

+58.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.20%

-33.24%

+27.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-17.10%

+13.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.43%

Volatility

GXPS vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPSNVDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

70.59%

-56.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.26%

90.34%

-76.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.26%

90.34%

-76.08%

GXPS vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDL's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXPS vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison

GXPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
GXPS
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
0.54%0.59%0.00%0.00%
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXPS and NVDL have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDL.

GXPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for NVDL.

GXPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while NVDL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GXPS and 1.05% for NVDL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPS and NVDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer