PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPE vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPE vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPE achieves a 20.25% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 4.51% return.


GXPE

1D
-1.80%
1M
-9.28%
YTD
20.25%
6M
21.31%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XYLD

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.34%
YTD
4.51%
6M
4.25%
1Y
15.48%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPE vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPE and XYLD is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPE vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXPE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPE vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXPEXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.36

GXPE vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXPE vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPE drawdown since its inception was -14.89%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPE and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPEXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.89%

-33.46%

+18.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.64%

-0.96%

-13.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-3.70%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

Volatility

GXPE vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPEXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.74%

6.85%

+13.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.74%

11.26%

+9.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.74%

14.18%

+6.56%

GXPE vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXPE vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

GXPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than XYLD's 10.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXPE
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF
1.00%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.54%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXPE and XYLD have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.54%, compared with 1.00% for GXPE.

GXPE is categorized as Energy Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPE and 0.60% for XYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPE and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer