GXPD vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GXPD (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. GXPD is passively managed, while EATZ is actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GXPD charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

GXPD vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPD achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly lower than EATZ's 4.80% return.

GXPD

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -2.13%
• YTD: -0.87%
• 6M: -0.98%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EATZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: -6.88%
• 3Y*: 10.53%
• 5Y*: 2.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPD vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF	-0.87%	5.44%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-14.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GXPD and EATZ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

GXPD vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EATZ

EATZ Risk / Return Rank: 10
EATZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Omega Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPD vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GXPD	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.12	+0.14

Drawdowns

GXPD vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPD drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum EATZ drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPD and EATZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXPD	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.61%	-34.40%	+17.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-23.21%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.21%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.48%	-13.56%	+8.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.27%	-13.40%	+9.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GXPD	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.91%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.01%	18.81%	+1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.01%	21.65%	-1.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.01%	21.60%	-1.59%

GXPD vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXPD vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

GXPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than EATZ's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF	0.19%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXPD and EATZ in my portfolio?

GXPD and EATZ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GXPD or EATZ?

On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXPD or EATZ?

GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXPD or EATZ?

EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.19% for GXPD.

What is the main difference between GXPD and EATZ?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPD and 1.00% for EATZ.