GXLK.L vs. LYYB.DE
GXLK.L (SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF) and LYYB.DE (Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - GXLK.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while LYYB.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Broad Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GXLK.L returned 19.28%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for LYYB.DE. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXLK.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for LYYB.DE.
Performance
GXLK.L vs. LYYB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GXLK.L is traded in GBP, while LYYB.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYYB.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXLK.L achieves a 14.22% return, which is significantly higher than LYYB.DE's 8.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GXLK.L has outperformed LYYB.DE with an annualized return of 19.28%, while LYYB.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 13.83% annualized return.
GXLK.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- 6M
- 17.22%
- YTD
- 14.22%
- 1Y
- 27.54%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.53%
LYYB.DE
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 18.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.72%
GXLK.L vs. LYYB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXLK.L SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF | 14.22% | 15.88% | 24.73% | 48.31% | -40.75% | 34.21% | 43.38% | 49.62% | -1.81% | 33.90% |
LYYB.DE Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist | 8.52% | 8.18% | 25.55% | 19.77% | -12.47% | 29.00% | 15.73% | 27.68% | 0.17% | 11.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLK.L and LYYB.DE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, GXLK.L and LYYB.DE have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXLK.L vs. LYYB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GXLK.L
LYYB.DE
GXLK.L vs. LYYB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) and Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXLK.L | LYYB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 2.14 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.95 | 7.07 | -3.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXLK.L vs. LYYB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLK.L drawdown since its inception was -43.09%, which is greater than LYYB.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLK.L and LYYB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXLK.L | LYYB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.09% | -34.46% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.67% | -8.74% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.24% | -23.18% | -5.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.09% | -23.18% | -19.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.09% | -26.76% | -16.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.98% | -1.56% | -8.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.58% | -5.01% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.00% | 2.65% | +4.35% |
Volatility
GXLK.L vs. LYYB.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE) at 3.07%. This indicates that GXLK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYYB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXLK.L | LYYB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 3.07% | +4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.44% | 8.01% | +8.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.55% | 11.74% | +9.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.58% | 15.20% | +9.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.33% | 16.05% | +8.28% |
GXLK.L vs. LYYB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXLK.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LYYB.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXLK.L vs. LYYB.DE - Dividend Comparison
GXLK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYYB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXLK.L SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYYB.DE Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist | 0.81% | 0.99% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 1.12% | 0.95% | 1.31% | 1.14% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.87% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXLK.L and LYYB.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYYB.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYYB.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXLK.L.
GXLK.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while LYYB.DE is Large Cap Blend Equities. GXLK.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while LYYB.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Broad Select. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXLK.L and 0.09% for LYYB.DE.
Find the right allocation for GXLK.L and LYYB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer