GXLC vs. USPX
GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) and USPX (Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - GXLC tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index while USPX tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GXLC charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for USPX.
Performance
GXLC vs. USPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXLC achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly higher than USPX's 7.52% return.
GXLC
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- 8.02%
- 6M
- 6.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USPX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 20.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.22%
- 5Y*
- 11.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
GXLC vs. USPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 8.02% | 3.22% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 7.52% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLC and USPX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXLC vs. USPX — Risk / Return Rank
GXLC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USPX
GXLC vs. USPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXLC | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.63 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXLC vs. USPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLC drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, smaller than the maximum USPX drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC and USPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXLC | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -31.21% | +22.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.31% | -3.56% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -4.43% | +2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.11% | — |
Volatility
GXLC vs. USPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXLC | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.75% | 12.67% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 16.27% | -2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 15.95% | -2.20% |
GXLC vs. USPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXLC has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than USPX's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXLC vs. USPX - Dividend Comparison
GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than USPX's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.65% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 1.11% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.35% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 2.51% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 2.60% | 4.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, GXLC and USPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for USPX.
USPX has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.65% for GXLC.
GXLC tracks Solactive GBS United States 500 Index, while USPX tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for GXLC and 0.03% for USPX.
Find the right allocation for GXLC and USPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer