GXLC vs. STXF

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) and STXF (Strive 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - GXLC tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index while STXF tracks the Bloomberg US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GXLC charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for STXF.

Performance

GXLC vs. STXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and Strive 500 ETF (STXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GXLC having a 7.92% return and STXF slightly higher at 7.97%.

GXLC

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -2.12%
• YTD: 7.92%
• 6M: 6.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

STXF

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -1.80%
• YTD: 7.97%
• 6M: 6.65%
• 1Y: 21.84%
• 3Y*: 21.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXLC vs. STXF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	7.92%	3.22%
STXF Strive 500 ETF	7.97%	2.95%

Correlation

The correlation between GXLC and STXF is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.98

Return for Risk

GXLC vs. STXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

STXF

STXF Risk / Return Rank: 56
STXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
STXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
STXF Omega Ratio Rank: 53
STXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
STXF Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXLC vs. STXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and Strive 500 ETF (STXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GXLC	STXF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.69	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.36	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.36	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.21	—

Drawdowns

GXLC vs. STXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXLC drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, smaller than the maximum STXF drawdown of -19.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC and STXF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXLC	STXF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.08%	-19.00%	+9.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.29%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.40%	-3.36%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.56%	-2.30%	+0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GXLC	STXF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.96%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.78%	12.99%	+0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.78%	16.16%	-2.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.78%	16.16%	-2.38%

GXLC vs. STXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXLC has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than STXF's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GXLC vs. STXF - Dividend Comparison

GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than STXF's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.65%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
STXF Strive 500 ETF	1.05%	1.05%	1.13%	1.21%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXLC and STXF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, GXLC and STXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, GXLC or STXF?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXLC or STXF?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for STXF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXLC or STXF?

STXF has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.65% for GXLC.

What is the main difference between GXLC and STXF?

GXLC tracks Solactive GBS United States 500 Index, while STXF tracks Bloomberg US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for GXLC and 0.05% for STXF.