GXLC vs. SIXA
GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) and SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GXLC is passively managed, while SIXA is actively managed. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GXLC charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for SIXA.
Performance
GXLC vs. SIXA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXLC achieves a 13.47% return, which is significantly lower than SIXA's 15.76% return.
GXLC
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- 6M
- 13.22%
- YTD
- 13.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SIXA
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- YTD
- 15.76%
- 1Y
- 19.93%
- 3Y*
- 20.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.68K | $22.15K | $18.83K | |
| $1.65M | $1.61M | $862.84K |
GXLC vs. SIXA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 13.47% | 3.22% |
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 15.76% | 1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLC and SIXA is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXLC vs. SIXA — Risk / Return Rank
GXLC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SIXA
GXLC vs. SIXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXLC | SIXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXLC vs. SIXA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLC drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, smaller than the maximum SIXA drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC and SIXA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXLC | SIXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -18.38% | +9.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.37% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -2.93% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.47% | — |
Volatility
GXLC vs. SIXA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXLC | SIXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.71% | 9.12% | +4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.71% | 12.78% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.71% | 13.26% | +0.45% |
GXLC vs. SIXA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXLC has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXA's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXLC vs. SIXA - Dividend Comparison
GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than SIXA's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.88% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 1.96% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.12% | 2.23% | 1.63% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXLC and SIXA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.
SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.88% for GXLC.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for GXLC and 0.86% for SIXA.
Find the right allocation for GXLC and SIXA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer