PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXLC vs. ESUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXLC vs. ESUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and Eventide US Market ETF (ESUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXLC achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly lower than ESUM's 12.33% return.


GXLC

1D
0.09%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
8.02%
6M
6.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ESUM

1D
1.00%
1M
2.28%
YTD
12.33%
6M
10.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXLC vs. ESUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
8.02%3.22%
ESUM
Eventide US Market ETF
12.33%-0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between GXLC and ESUM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXLC vs. ESUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and Eventide US Market ETF (ESUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXLC vs. ESUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXLC vs. ESUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXLC drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, which is greater than ESUM's maximum drawdown of -8.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC and ESUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXLCESUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.08%

-8.13%

-0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-0.53%

-2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-1.61%

+0.04%

Volatility

GXLC vs. ESUM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXLCESUMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.75%

14.32%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.75%

14.32%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.75%

14.32%

-0.57%

GXLC vs. ESUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXLC has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than ESUM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXLC vs. ESUM - Dividend Comparison

GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than ESUM's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM2025
ESUM
Eventide US Market ETF
0.57%0.48%
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
0.65%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXLC and ESUM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ESUM.

GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.57% for ESUM.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Eventide. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for GXLC and 0.39% for ESUM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXLC and ESUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer