PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXLC.L vs. XWTS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXLC.L vs. XWTS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GXLC.L is traded in GBP, while XWTS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XWTS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXLC.L achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than XWTS.L's 4.08% return.


GXLC.L

1D
1.55%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
2.07%
6M
0.11%
1Y
20.77%
3Y*
22.19%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*

XWTS.L

1D
1.04%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
4.08%
6M
2.50%
1Y
25.92%
3Y*
23.66%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXLC.L vs. XWTS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GXLC.L
SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF
2.07%19.01%33.60%45.06%-29.78%18.90%22.83%25.39%-13.71%
XWTS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C
4.05%19.78%37.00%40.06%-30.36%17.13%18.90%21.45%-6.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GXLC.L and XWTS.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2018

0.89

The correlation between GXLC.L and XWTS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

GXLC.L vs. XWTS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GXLC.L
XWTS.L

Communication Services

100.0%
96.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

GXLC.L
100.0%
XWTS.L
96.6%

Basic Materials

GXLC.L

-

XWTS.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

GXLC.L

-

XWTS.L
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

GXLC.L

-

XWTS.L

-

Energy

GXLC.L

-

XWTS.L

-

Financial Services

GXLC.L

-

XWTS.L

-

Healthcare

GXLC.L

-

XWTS.L

-

Industrials

GXLC.L

-

XWTS.L

-

Real Estate

GXLC.L

-

XWTS.L
0.1%

Technology

GXLC.L

-

XWTS.L
1.9%

Utilities

GXLC.L

-

XWTS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXLC.L vs. XWTS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXLC.L
GXLC.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
GXLC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

XWTS.L
XWTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XWTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXLC.L vs. XWTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GXLC.LXWTS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.90

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.15

10.83

-1.67

GXLC.L vs. XWTS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXLC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the XWTS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXLC.L and XWTS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXLC.LXWTS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.81

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.65

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.64

+0.05

Drawdowns

GXLC.L vs. XWTS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXLC.L drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, roughly equal to the maximum XWTS.L drawdown of -35.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC.L and XWTS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXLC.LXWTS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.84%

-35.58%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-8.90%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.45%

-21.21%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.84%

-35.58%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.54%

-3.02%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-7.73%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.39%

+0.02%

Volatility

GXLC.L vs. XWTS.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) at 4.12%. This indicates that GXLC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XWTS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXLC.LXWTS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

4.12%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

10.28%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.32%

14.28%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.92%

18.37%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.04%

18.06%

+0.98%

GXLC.L vs. XWTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXLC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XWTS.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXLC.L vs. XWTS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GXLC.L nor XWTS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, GXLC.L and XWTS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GXLC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XWTS.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXLC.L and 0.25% for XWTS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXLC.L and XWTS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer