GXLC.L vs. SWRD.L
GXLC.L (SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF) and SWRD.L (SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXLC.L is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while SWRD.L is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXLC.L returned 11.50%/yr vs 13.18%/yr for SWRD.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXLC.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SWRD.L.
Performance
GXLC.L vs. SWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GXLC.L is traded in GBP, while SWRD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SWRD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXLC.L achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than SWRD.L's 10.32% return.
GXLC.L
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 20.77%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- —
SWRD.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- —
GXLC.L vs. SWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXLC.L SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF | 2.07% | 19.01% | 33.60% | 45.06% | -29.78% | 18.90% | 22.83% | 16.59% |
SWRD.L SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF | 10.29% | 12.46% | 21.34% | 18.20% | -8.04% | 23.27% | 12.48% | 13.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLC.L and SWRD.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2019 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GXLC.L and SWRD.L has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
GXLC.L vs. SWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXLC.L
SWRD.L
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
GXLC.L
SWRD.L
Basic Materials
GXLC.L
-
SWRD.L
Consumer Cyclical
GXLC.L
-
SWRD.L
Consumer Defensive
GXLC.L
-
SWRD.L
Energy
GXLC.L
-
SWRD.L
Financial Services
GXLC.L
-
SWRD.L
Healthcare
GXLC.L
-
SWRD.L
Industrials
GXLC.L
-
SWRD.L
Real Estate
GXLC.L
-
SWRD.L
Technology
GXLC.L
-
SWRD.L
Utilities
GXLC.L
-
SWRD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXLC.L vs. SWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
GXLC.L
SWRD.L
GXLC.L vs. SWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXLC.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.44 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 4.20 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.15 | 15.90 | -6.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXLC.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 2.35 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.92 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.85 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
GXLC.L vs. SWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLC.L drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, which is greater than SWRD.L's maximum drawdown of -26.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC.L and SWRD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXLC.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.84% | -26.90% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.66% | -6.47% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.45% | -18.71% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.84% | -18.71% | -17.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | -0.14% | -4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | -3.22% | -4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 1.71% | +0.70% |
Volatility
GXLC.L vs. SWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) at 3.43%. This indicates that GXLC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXLC.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 3.43% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 8.79% | +0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.32% | 11.57% | +1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 14.37% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 16.41% | +2.63% |
GXLC.L vs. SWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXLC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SWRD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXLC.L vs. SWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GXLC.L nor SWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GXLC.L and SWRD.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWRD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXLC.L.
GXLC.L is categorized as Communications Equities, while SWRD.L is Large Cap Growth Equities. GXLC.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while SWRD.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXLC.L and 0.12% for SWRD.L.
Find the right allocation for GXLC.L and SWRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer